Show NESON NELSON DIVORCE IS UNDER ADVISEMENT Plaintiff Cuts Out Her Hel Demand De Dc- I mand For 1200 All Ali AI- AI mony WANTS NAME AND FREEDOM I Jon Don't Dont humi zm mit Money Wouldn't III Ic he It I ull Cant Can't n t Get It I 1 is h Inferred l. l by at the time lust in Il munt the cutlet court would refute U to 0 grant a i di divorce 1 ii vorce in iii time tho Nelson lul suit hull Attorney j John V. V. V Burton declared In lii his nl argument that Celia Cela A. A Nel Nelion ol 0 would hi not nuL le- le 10 ilie e ml lH I I tho ono point on In which im helm tho 10 easo a n wits wH as coni contested hlll by ly David il A. A Nelson Nelbon Th The flu only thing that Mrs es Nel on Nolt-on ul asks Is imer hel freedom an and amid time the c of ur if h lice her name The Tho n luki-n under h by rase was J Judge G George CU O fl 1 A Armstrong 1 Monday a after aCel time of or ai ali alimony al- al I- I tho thu of 1101 mony was wat I the Ime plaintiff When time the suit bull fl for fOI divorce dl was waN first talked of ur time question lle UOn of alimony was n raised a Attorney Din hutton Button ion demanded for ful Mrs 1 Nelson un an aim ni absolute d decree of 11 the time c restoration of lice her maiden and amid alimony to tu be hc paid lame f u as I In n mm a I Mini Hun of lf I In Installments tal nu-tal I to tu be he decided upon by liy the lie court court TIme The hl fIrst two point were conceded but hut Nelson Nel Nob- son on objected to 10 11 paying alimony Ills Il 11 attorneys II I. I P. P Henderson and amid uI A A. A J. J chel thrashed over u CI the question of alimony tot for tOI days Ilay but hut no agi cement time the could be he reached It I was on question of ot or al alimony which was abandoned at itt time the last Jal moment that t I the hm h Sl suit bull 1 was brought blough t. t I In mm Ii his Is argument Attorney Burton scored Noise el l if fn 01 his ii hl Is treatment t iea t iii c mm t tai Joward Jo- Jo o- o ward ai ti hi his wife wife ll lie Il th the hue court If 11 it i would be le proper to I compel a ato woman Ulunto to be driven mad mUll before s she he could get gel gelu et eta u U. 1 divorce dl I fm from in a an al m m I rate Irate hutC co complaining nm rda I n I abusive husband lie le stated that Attorney At At- torney Henderson I OI had hud In iii his Imis argument that lint they lucy ought to try It I again aJain and amid see eo If t could not nol b be adjusted without a 1 decIe de de- cIe cree emee ton said alL that Mrs 1 Nelson would nC never 1 return to hurt her husband again al and amid try my to tu live with him He lie le lesIL said safI sIL that It Il was wn Impossible and amid alil that hut force furce would not reconcile them A Attorney Aloney t flu Bin Durol u ton toil d declared ecla roil I in 11 mm answering Henderson that thal the only way wa lie HIP J were vemo dragged into the c ease c was on oil Oi account that he lie and amid W. W H. H Newman both members of Ir the time board of education wein WIO interested In the tIme cube case I He Ic aJ alt aba o referred to tu time the clO of ur if A. A J J. J T TV V Weber her In him defense of Nelson as us lS a Fourth of Jul July talk and closed his argument by ly declaring that Mrs 11 Nelson would not accept almon alimony that hint she Iw did not mint want It 1 and aul that he hc u asked l cd that the time demand for or alimony be bo stricken 1 from tho prayer pryer |