Show I LOSS OF ONE EYE COST RAILROAD JUST An opinion a affirming the ju judgment for Cor rendered by the thc lower court in the case se of D. D R. R Morrison respondent a against tho the San Pedro Los Angeles and Salt Lake Lal railroad was handed down Wednesday odne in the ic I-ic Supreme court The Tho case caso was appealed and whether on a question of or evidence William illiam Braner had done clone his hla duties dulicH as train dispatcher The Iho opinion hold held that Braner was vice principal in the tho action and that the court nad iad not notI erred in submitting testimony to the Jury ju r The rIte action nas wa filed b by Morrison In tho tim lower court to recover damages for Cor the loss of or the sight on one of or his eyes ees which was sustained In a Collision near Nevada It stated In itt the complaint that Braner did not fulfill train dispatcher and that his orders ordel as US as aa an of too the company he hewa wa was responsible for the accident The Jury In the lower court h held hl that It was wal negligence on the part of the tho company which caused life collision and a ver verdict was ms given I en the plaintiff for and co costs ts Tho rho Supreme court opinion affirming tho the judgment was waN written by Judge F Erickson of the Seventh Judicial district Justice X N. N N. being disqualified to sit lIt lItIn In iii tho the case casc Ills His opinion was concurred in hi b by Chief Justice W M M. McCarthy and Ju Justice Joseph E. E Frick Prick Two cases were argued and amI submitted submitted submit submit- I ted In lii tho the Supreme court Wednesday The cases were J J. J P. P ONeill O'Neill appellant appellant appel appel- lant against the O Ogden den Aerie Acne No 0 of Fraternal Order of or Eagles anti and the Salt Lake Lako Investment In company compan a against Jesse e M. M Fox appellant I |