Show T T. T W. W JONES ON BOND QUESTION S SAYS SAYS- I I I ir n the taxpayers of Iron County vote I Ito to bond the county for an additional and the bonds find a marl marI mar- mar I l I tut bt they would yield in my opinion not more than W or i at the toe very most moot The 3 to 4 thousand difference would be lost as u follows I commission low bond market I win wID account for 2 I to 3 s thousand dollars dol dol- I lars and nd to this must be added the Oust cost of or election The county would i ir r therefore loose almos t enough to maintain school for two weeks On tl 11 Cw r other thu hand if the Board Doard could pry bly refund the present bond re reth retirement reo re- th nent nt and use the money for there would be no ad- ad I cost except Interest which appear in any event II By DJ y the students especially in ini i subjects required for promotion for the next neat few tew weeks school could be te des clos- I j wl ed month or more early wl without out I loss 1083 to the children and withIn without with with- I sat out In any way necessitating a I Van tans of ed the work done this year J It U Is very ry true that such a plan plen may maycan eaR can for lor a partial lowering of present I school standards but as required sub sub- l L' L Jeda for promotion from one grade to another er are really few in number Iti it i win be assumed that promotions could I be lie made marie as usual even with a much shorter charter school year It 11 Is h unthinkable that the schools be forced to close until such n a time Ume when the children can be promoted pro pro- I or ut t least carried to such uch a point paint they can tan be picked up upI I Jl next neat t Sear jear ar without repetition of the k Ii yens yen's work 1 T. T W. W JONES |