OCR Text |
Show ALIAS SUMMONS IS THE DISTRICT COURT OF the First Judicial District of the territory of Utah, Utah coun y. The Anglo American Loan.Mortgage &Agency Co., Limited, of London, a corporation, plaintiff, plain-tiff, vs. Thomas F. Earl and Harriett E. Earl, his wife. The Lombard luvestment company, a corporation, and MiHon B. Whitney, Charles S. Fairchild, Harry E Moonev, Santord B. Ladd and Frank Hagerman, receivers of The Lombard investment company, defendants. The People of tne territory of Utah send greeting to Thomas F. Earl aud Harriett E. Earl, his wife. The Lombard Investment company, com-pany, a corporation, and Milton B. Whitney. Charles S. Fairchild. Harry E. iVooney. San-ford San-ford B. Ladd aud Frat'k Hagerman, receivers cf The Lombard luvestment company, defendants. de-fendants. You are hereby required to appear in an action ac-tion brought against you by the aboye named plaintiff, iu the district court ot the First ju- I diciat district of the territory of Utah, and to answer the complaint tiled tuerain, within ten j days (exclusive of the day of service) alter the service on you of this summons if served withiu this county; or if served out of this i cuuty, but in this district, within twenty days; otheiwiso wiihin forty days or judgment by default will be taken agaiust you, according to prayer of this com plaint. The said action is brought to obtaiu a decree of this court against the defendants herein for the sum of 41,702-70, with interest at 12 per cent. Der annum, from the 1st day of January, A. D, 1M5, until paid, and for i 150.00 attorney fees, and for costs of suit. PlaiutitT alieires that ou the 4th day of March, 18UO, 'i horoas F. and Harriett E. Earl, h.s wife, executed and delivered to The Lombard investment company com-pany a certain bond in the sum of Sl.tio0.U0, with 0 per cent- iuterest per annum, with 12 percent, after maturity That two of said coupons have not bceu paid aud that the same with the principal has been declared due and payable. That on March 21st, 1890. the said Lombard Co sold and assigned the said note to plai..tiff, who is now the leira holder thereof, there-of, aud did theu nd there guarantee tho pay-meritof pay-meritof the withiu note and principal within two years from said last menno ed date. That tho usual decree may be made for the sale of the said premises to pay snid debt, interest, eosis and attorney fees, that the proceeds of sa:e may be applied iu pavmeui of the amount due plaintiff, and that said deiendauts and each of them uud ail persons claiming under them or either of them subsequent to the execution exe-cution of said mortgage upon said premises, either as purchasers, encumbrancers or otherwise, other-wise, may be barred and foreclosed of all right, claim, ur equity of redemption in said premises and every par thereof, and that the said plaintiff may have judgment and execution execu-tion ugainst tho said defendants Thomas F. Earl and Harriett E. Earl aud 'l he Lmtiard Investment company, ,lor any deficiency which may remain at ter applying the proceeds pro-ceeds ol taio. For f untir particulars see copy of complaint On file. And you are hereby notified that if you fail to appear and answer the said comptatut as above required, the said plaintiff will apply to the court for the relief therein demanued, and costs of suit. Witness the Hon. William II King, judge, and t lie seal of the District court of the First judicial district in and for Ieal the territory of L tab; this 15th day of February, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred aud ninety-five, J. W, Beasley. Clerk. By Geo. Haveucami', Deputy Clerk. James A. Williams, attorney for plainiitr. |