OCR Text |
Show THE fflPT pIirSHMJ i Hi luoni yuhutiii. Setting of Miscellaneous Cases for Early Days in (lie Term. The Criminal Calendar Contains Con-tains a LoZ of Antiquated Regulation Cases. Law and fVSotfon Department Comes to the Front vrith SevoraJ important Suits. LAW AND MOTION. Anna Marks vs. Bello Tompkms; motion for a nev trial; J L Rawlins for plaintiff, and Sutherland & Judd for defendants. B Darger et al ys. St V Le Sieur; motion to relax costs; M M Kellog for plaintiff, and Arthur Brown for defendant. de-fendant. B F Milner vs. Geo. Needham, et al; demurrer to complaint; Geo. Sutherland Suther-land for plaintiff. John B Milner vs Provo city; motion mo-tion to retax costs; J W N Whitecot-ton Whitecot-ton for plaintiff , and Geo Sutherland and W II King for defendant. .Seils S Eliason vs. Henry F Daniels, Dan-iels, et al, motion to retax costs: W K lleid for plaintiff, and W. Zabriskie tor defendant. Jane Memmott vs. J W Memmott; motion to set aside proof,' etc; M M Kellogg for plaintiff and George Suth-land Suth-land for defendant. Martin & Drake Live Stock Association, Asso-ciation, vs. John M Daiton; demurrer to amenp complaint; George Sutherland Suther-land for plaintiff, and King&llouiz for defendant. James C York vs. J. D. Jones; demurrer de-murrer to complaint; King & Houtz and Saxey & Whitecotton for plaintiff, plain-tiff, and Geo, Sutherland for defendant. defend-ant. F M Wilson vs. Geo. Ercanbrack; motion to relax costs and for new trial; King & Houtz for plaintiff, and J B Milner and J W Whitecotton for defendant. de-fendant. Anna- Marts vs. W fl Culmer et ah; demurrei, motion to retax costs; Geo X...vad and C S Varian for n- tiSW ,1-" .'- - .'Arthur Brown for delendant. AY) drew J Walton et al vs. E W Jones et at; motion for new trial; Sutherland fc Judd for plaintiff, and Geo Sutherland for plaintiff j. Pasiuine C Anderson, vs. Christiau Anderson et al; Demurrer to complaint; com-plaint; G W Moyer for plaintiff, and King & Houtz for defendant. P C Anderson et al vs. Neils L Eliasen et atf motion for new trial; W K PieRl for plaintiff, and Jacob Johnson for defendant. Leo Whitehead vs. A O Smoot; demurrer to complaint; E 13 Critchlow & J L Hawlings for plaintiff, and King & iloutz for defendant. Mary Ellen West fail vs. Walter K Barton et ai; demurrer io complaint; Jacob Johnson tor plaintiff, and V K Ueid for dofemont. Emery C unty Mcr. Co. vs. St Y Le Sieur; demurrer to complaint; A Bal-linger Bal-linger for plaintiffs, and Geo Sutherland Suther-land for defendant. Aim;; Hague vs. II II Dodd, et al; demurrer to complaint; Booth fc Wilson Wil-son for plain till', and Geo Sutherland for defendant-. Ole Madsen et al. vs. liana Mar-quardsen; Mar-quardsen; demurrer to complaint; W II King for plaintiffs, and Geo Sutherland Suther-land for defendant. Thos Broadbent vs. Monroe Irrigation Irriga-tion Co; motion to dismiss action; W II McCarty for defendant. ArtemasIIolmau vs. Pleasant Grove City; motion for new trial; Saxey & Whitecotton for plaintiff, and King & Houtz for defendant. Nephi Plasier &Mfg. Co. vs. II F McCune; motion to retax costs: King & Houtz for plaintiffs, and Booth & Wilson Wil-son for defendant. George W Jacques vs. Ephriam Sutton Sut-ton et al; demurrer to complaint; M M Kellogg for plaintiff, and Geo Sutherland Suther-land for defendants. It M Rogers vs. Daniel Cook et al; motion for new trial; Saxey & Whitecotton White-cotton for plaintiff, and Geo Suther land for defendant. Provo city vs J C Xork; motion for new trial, King & Iloutz attorneys for plaintiff and J gB Milner for defendant. defend-ant. Chester I Paddock ts. Worthy Nash; demurrer to amend complaint; Saxey & Whitecoiton, attorney for plaintiff, and Geo Sutherland for defendant. Agnes I lligby et al: vs. Thomas Hitchings; demurrer to complaint; Saxey & Whitecotton for plaintiff, and King'iD Iloutz for defendant. C KIMINAL CALENDAR. United States vs William 11 May; unlawiul cohabitation; II S attorney for U S and King & Iloutz for de- United States vs George W Gee; unlawful cohabitation, U S attorney for U S and King & Iloutz for defendant. defend-ant. United States , vs John C Graham; unlawful cohabitation; U S attorney for U S and Thurmau & King for defendant. de-fendant. United States vs Wm Packer; adultery; adul-tery; U S attorney for U S and King Sc Iloutz for defendant-United defendant-United States vs Wra Packer; unlawful un-lawful cohabitation; U S attorney for US and King & Iloutz for defendant. defend-ant. United States vs Pleasant S Bradford; Brad-ford; unlawful cohabitation: U S attorney at-torney for U S and King i& Iloutz for defendant. United States vs J R Boshard; unlawful un-lawful cohabitation; U S attorney for U S and Saxey & "Whitecotton for defendant. de-fendant. United rotates vs John R Baker; injuring in-juring mail bag; U S attorney for U S and King & Iloutz for defendant. United States vs Kate Iloutz; fornication; forni-cation; U S attorney for U S and King & Houtz for dei'endaut. United States vs John A Mower; adultery; U S attorney for U S. The People etc.. vs George W Hancock Han-cock et al, murder; district attorney, King &. Houl.. Tiie People etc., vs James Chad-wick Chad-wick et al. grand larceny; district attorney at-torney fur IVupie. and George Sutherland Suther-land for defendants. The I'euplo etc., vs Wm R May; appeal; ap-peal; district attorney for People, and Saxey & Wh'.teootton for defendants. The People, etc,, vs. Levi P Dunham; Dun-ham; resisting an officer; District Attorney At-torney for the People. Tlie People, etc., vs. Jesse Buckner, et al.; appeal; District Attorney for the People, and Saxey & Whitecotton for defendants. The People, etc., vs. John R Robert' Rob-ert' ; appeal; District Attorney for People, and J B Milner defendant. The People, etc., vs. S N Swartz; appeal; District Attorney for People, and A G Sutherland for defendant. Fountain Greer:, vs. Antone E Christensen, et at., appeal: Jacob Johnson for People, and W K Re id for defendants. American Fork city, vs. G M Boley, appeal; J J Gushing for defendant. Provo city, vs. G W Ilowland; appeal; ap-peal; King & Iloutz for plaintiff, and Bennett, Marshal and Bradley for defendant. de-fendant. The civil and divorce calender will appear next issue. The following criminal cases have been set. FEBRUARY. 18TH. United States vs. C C Christensen: unlawful cohabitation. United States vs. Thomas Feathev-stone; Feathev-stone; unlawful cohabitation. United States vs. James M Allred; adultery. United States vs, C. John Ostler; adultery. FEBRUARY 19X11. United States vs. Charles D. Smith; adultery. United States vs. Joseph Dillworth; adultery. United States vs. John C Harper; unlawful cohabitation. FEBRUARY ilOTII. United States vs Heniy Mower; unlawful un-lawful cohabitation. United States vs Benjamin B-nnttt; fornication. United States ts B W Driggs; adultery. adul-tery. FEBRUARY 21ST. United States vs Thomas Wooley; unlawful cohabitation. United States vs Joseph Bartholomew; Bartholo-mew; adultery. FEIJRUARY 2:iD. United States vs' James Jorgesiscn; adultery. United States vs Nelis II Jeo.-.-or, unlawful cohabitation. Tho People vs Benjamin Formats; grand larceny. Pk niuLAJ-filX"- - me FebpfQ' vs Carroll Anderson; battery. The People vs Samuel Mulberry; murder. FEBRUARY 2-JTII. The People vs Charles L Dubois. FEBRUARY 2oTII, Tlie People vs E W Jones; felony. |