OCR Text |
Show Incentive parking A possible solution would be to have better parking for those who actually want to be in class Brandon Schembn Opinions writer Parking sucks. It's an atrocity. The new library, grand in scale, takes up space -- lots of parking space, that is. With only 8,000 parking spots to work with, and a significantly larger student body, there is a problem. True, there are spaces available out in no man's land by the testing center with a bus en route to the school every 15 minutes. And those who have paid the absurd price for parking permits meander throughout the already packed lots, those lots that are actually within reasonable walking distance. Therefore, the only sensible thing to do is to propose a change. Why not thank those with high grades with priority parking? Granted, the school will lose money (they'll lose $50 a pop, for permits), but the aggressive academics will have the leisure of parking close to the school's doors, without the stress of competing for spots on the pavement. Recipients also would have a "get out of jail free card" from the vicious cam- Dave Iba/ UVU Review pus police, who revel in their ticketing abilities. Besides, those who want to excel academically are sure to be in class and exert themselves to get the necessary high grades, so why not aid them in the process? The school can do their part in compensating those who have a drive to succeed. Incoming freshman would be glad to know that their 4.0 paid off not just in tuition and living expenses, but can spare them the un- necessary stresses of college parking as now present. What about those that don't get high enough grades? Not everyone can pull off the A grade, especially when a professor only plans to give out one or two a semester. Look, exercise has never been a negative thing. Athletes, especially, would enjoy the practice. Why not give them the farthest spots? Though parking would remain an unpleasant experience, we can rest assured that improvements are in the works. The point still stands: We won't be around to see it. Give priority to the intellectually inclined. Perhaps this could inspire a greater student body in future years. Then maybe they will bask in the glory of a multilevel parking complex or a cavernous underground parking network. But for now, get the A grade or walk. The debate on proposition 8 we can all understand each other, even a town with one Opinions writer aggregate craving for InWell, it's the start of an- And-Out Burger big enough other school year, which is a to almost make us all colbigger adjustment for some lectively drive to Vegas this than others. I'm a seasoned very second. Along with this narrow veteran at this. I moved to Utah for college 5 years ago individualism and homeand have lived here ever state-pride, however, comes since, taking classes on and a mentality of blamelessoff (mostly off) all the while. ness. Example: how many Unlike the masses who flock times have you heard someback .home for summer, I one complain about "those have made Provo my home. gosh dang Utah drivers"? I am home for the sum- The ironic thing is, most of the time those very drivers mer. I treasure the lighter that are being complained traffic, less-crowded restau- about probably just traded rants, and higher density of in their Washington plates normal people that 20-some- for Utah ones last week. My things like myself enjoy over point is that for anyone cura Provo summer. As "every- rently living here to criticize one else" comes back every all things Utah is to criticize fall, Utah Valley can resume themselves, for we are all business as usual, because to "those people." If we are all outsiders "everyone else," time stood still here until their Raintree looking in, are we not staring at nothing? Let us instead Fall contracts began. What an interesting town embrace our fate, that we're it is that I live in: A dumping not in Kansas anymore (figground for Mormon families uratively, unless you moved all over the nation and world here from Kansas, then litwho wanted to straighten out .erally), that we are in fact their misled kids by throw- residents of the place we ing them into a veritable G- are now living. This way, if rated breeding ground with a something sucks here, we're bunch of other kids who are all to blame. This way, you in the exact same situation. need not go too far out of Yeah that's a great plan, or your way to mention the disone with disaster written all claimer on your MySpace profile that while it says you over it. I forget which. So Provo (and when I say live in Provo, you're always Provo, I mean Provo/Orem a (insert home state here) girl as a college town, not the at heart. This way, when you cities themselves with their go to California this summer native residents) is a melt- to sell Pest Control or return ing pot of sorts (albeit with to your hometown to rekinwhat appear to be mostly dle the dwindling flame with identical ingredients). It is a that old high school sweettown with more than a few heart, you will know that if Texas-flag-adorned apart- all else fails, there's always ment windows, a town with a place for you in the social enough regional American orphanage for 20-somedialects that it's a wonder things that is Provo. Chance Clm Crossword of the week Greg Wilcox Web editor Across The issue of same-sex marriage is one that turns the otherwise politically apathetic into rabid activists. Where one has tended to not look into the full spectrum of politics, this particular issue causes him/her to become an indignant mudslinger whose vote is decided. Recently, proposition 8 has caused quite a stir, particularly among Mormons. This is in large part due to a letter sent by the LDS first presidency urging Californian members to donate money and time to pass this amendment -- one that would solidify marriage as between man and woman. Now many who would profess to leave important decisions to states instead of the national government are threatened by California's state decision. What would the consequences of prop 8 failing be? More than likely, nothing. It is true that a lot of people want to keep the label of marriage pure (as they perceive it), but it's essentially nothing more than a battle of semantics that should be left to respective religions. We should recognize the validity of a religion's choice to define marriage between man and woman, but such impassioned opposition toward government recognition of same-sex unions is unwarranted and only intensifies cultural animosity. This tough issue has no easy solution, and will inevitably leave many people embittered, no matter the outcome. But consider the fact that the U.S. Constitution created a republic that was designed to protect the minority from the persecution of the majority. Sure, we have certain democratic aspects to Obama. What about you? 1- Leg or arm; 5- Exclamations of relief; 9- Summit; 12- Like some vaccines; 13- Depressed spirits; 15- Adriatic port; 16- Musical composition for one; 17- Pilfer; 18- Sea eagle; 19- Pastoral poem; 21- Hallowed; 23Cat sound; 24- Biol., e.g.; 25- Rise; 28- Pulse; 33- Office person; 34- Tent stick; 35chance!; 36- Norse goddess; 37- Greek epic poem; 38-"... the cows come home"; 39- Electric fish; 41- Sect; 42- Pineapple fiber; 44- Pure; 46- Resounds; 47- Steal from; 48- Low card; 49- Pure; 53- Hearing distance; 57- Chess piece; 58- Bellows; 60- Heavy book; 61- Actress Heche; 62Furze; 63- Ages; 64- Permit; 65- Hollow grass; 66- Tirade; Are you guys sure this is legal? Down Jordy Kirkman/UVU Review our government, but only within very specific boundaries. Perhaps the state should not dictate who should marry whom. Whether proposition 8 passes or fails, all states in the U.S. should recognize civil-unions for same-sex couples. This would ensure that all couples could receive equal benefits under the law, while also giving an espoused status that is separate from the term "marriage." Additionally, civil-unions should be given by the state indiscriminately, and what defines marriage should be left to the churches, not the state. Protecting the label of man-woman marriage is what will continue to cause many otherwise uninterested citizens to rise up in protest — citizens who are often disturbingly unaware of more pressing issues. Fair enough, but we must also seek to overcome our solipsism and recognize that same-sex couples should not be deprived of any civil liberties. How our country treats its minorities is a far better indicator of its character than a misguided quarrel over the word "marriage." Upholding equal rights in every instance-is demanded by the spirit of freedom and equality that epitomizes our country. Undeclared So, who are you voting for? Provo: It was like that when I got here 1-Comeupshort;2-Carnaromodel;3- Public walk; 4- Embarrassing mistake; 5- Utterly senseless; 6Modify; 7- Tint; 8- Mariners can sail on seven of these; 9- Sharp to the taste; 10- Writer Sarah Jewett; 11 Splotchy; 14- Laciniate; 15- Not malignant; 20- Greasy residue; 22- Very cold; 25- Pains; 26- Bed down; 27String quartet instrument; 28- Defiles; 29- Land map; 30- Maxim; 31- Useful; 32- Type of pitch; 34- In addition to; 37- Floating mass; 40- Hit; 42- Champagne bucket; 43- Unprofessional lawyer; 45- Brine-cured salmon; 46- Rubbed out; 48- To the point; 49- Orsk's river; 50- Zilch; 51Blanc; 52- Way out; 54- Israeli round dance; 55- Yemen neighbor; 56- Trial; 59- Modern art?; I 9 10 IS 18 Comic by Jordy Kirkman You know, with us voting for opposite candidates our votes cancel each other's out Wow. You're right. What a waste of time. Let's go play video games instead. You ve got my vote! Only 27% of college students vote. Don't become a lazy statistic. That's cool, think I'm going for McCain This public service announcement brought to you by Undeclared Crossword puzzles provided by BesfCrowwords.com (http://www.beitcrosswords.com). Used wifh permission. 11 |