OCR Text |
Show I 2A Sun Advocate Price, Utah Thursday March 28, 2002 i sued warrant; Carbon County Sheriffs Office. 4 p.m. March 30. Julcnc Wyasket (42, Myton); 72-- hour Utah (:4U;i.m. March 19. Kamlall V. ( 'alumn (37, Price): court-issue- d warrant. I Jcpartmcnl of Corrections hold, court-issue- d warrant. war9:15 a.m. March 21. Elisa Chavez (23, Price); court-issue- d 10: 10 a. in. March 19. Michael C. Murray (25, Veyo); court-issue- d rant. Marrant. a.m. March 21. Kevin W. Cloward (23, Price); court-issue- d U: 12 ant. March 10. Ki titer I M. lixtmlts ( 20. Spimish Fork); warrant. 1 :55 p.m. March 2 . Patrick John Martak (30, Price); false writd 2:1 W p.m. March 10. Kichard A. Parry (IX. Wellington); ten statement; Wellington City Police Department. commitmenl. 2 p.m. March 2 1 . Jesse Joe Lopez (48, East Carbon City); court- 4:45 p.m. March 0. Mallicw Douglas Davis (I 'I, Price): court-issue- d issued warrant. ) wair.ml 3 p.m. March 21. Michael Anthony Wiilf (39, Salt Lake City); court-issued 5 p in. March I u. David I:. I lulsoii (35. ast Carlton City): court-issue- d warrant. f war rant. war8:45 p.m. March 21. Corin Ezell (20, Helper); court-issue- d h:2'p.nt. Match 10. Inlin Andrew Melo ( 24, Wellington): court-issue- d rant. waiianl. 10:50 p.m. March 21. Cdeia Ann Sandoval (52, Price); aggra11:311 pm. Match ll. Paul Jay Crilchlow (54. Price): driving' vated assault, intoxication; Price City Police Department under the tnllueiicvol an intoxicant (DIJI). unlawfully operating a 1:30 a.m. March 21 Kenneth S. Brown (24, Price); drivers limotor Celtic 1c witla mt headlights; Price City Police Department. cense suspensionrevocalion, open container of alcohol; Helper City d ooii. March 2i. Midi l iKleraro (43. Ilclper): Police Department committncii). war12:21 p.m. March 22. Cherie Shaw (29, Price); court-issue- d d 2 pan. Match 2D. Itacy I.. ( 'hristetisen (30, Price); rant cotiiiiuimvnl. 4 p.m. March 22. Shelley Gault (37, East Carbon City); court-issue- d 3 pan. March 2D. I .arry A. I crea (2ft. Price): unhiwrul possession warrant. use i ( a corilii tiled sultsiaiice. unlaw till possessionuse ol'drug 7:20 p.m. March 21 Jerando O. Conn (23, New Mexico); drivers I 'tali Department ot Correct ions hold, court-is- license suspcnsionrevocation. speeding traffic violation, open container of alcohol; Wellington City Police Department 7:45 p.m. March 22. Todd Alan Denby (33, Ifcxas); DUI, unlawful possessionuse of drag paraphernalia, unlawfully operatinga motor vehicle on a denied drivers license, failure to yield right of way traffic violation; Wellington City Police Department 9:45 p.m. March 22. James David Johnson (24, Price); court-issue- d warrant. Tin i"1 'jclni have in.uk' a sHiiifiiiint roiitrilintion 1:15 p.m. March 22. Teriy B. Gibson (35, Wellington); DUI,' to c'Hiimuiiitv m MMintv. May lie in iirofessiontil unlawful possessionuse of a controlled substance, unlawful posses-sionu(leld. vnliintis't servu of drug paraphernalia, following too closely traffic violapeer rt'rognitkjn. terson,tl transition, support of oilier women tion; Utah Highway Patrol. 1 :35 and or overcoming adversity. p.m. March 21 Timothy J. Frett (41, Price); DUI, stop sign traffic violation; East Carbon City Police Department Award to be presented at the 11:48 p.m. March 21 Doris K. Vanwagoner (35, Price); DUI: Annual Woman's Conference Price City Police Department. :38 a.m. March 23. Donna L. Warren (38, Price); intoxication; to be held Friday, April 26th , Price City Police Department CEU College Center 12:1(1 a.m. March 24. Heather Marie Gren (23, Helper); DUI; rlutiin-iti'iIniihi-Ity Aftnl .0. 'Jittl Wellington City Police Department I .lien Serfnstini. Mail to INJ I :55 a.m. March 24. Donald Savage (41 ftioe); court-issue- d warrant Itfl I.M Mam. Pthc IJT M!M Jail bookings 1 1 1 court-ordere- 8:55 p.m. March 24. Christopher James Wialkingshaw (31 Price); Utah Department of domestic assault criminal mischief, I Corrections hold; Price City Police Department 8:1 1 a.m. March 25. Robert Fisher (35, Price); smuggling contra? bandprohibited materials into a jail, hold for transport to the Utah State Prison; Carbon County Sheriffs Office. ; war 10:25 a.m. March 25. Cherie Shaw (29, Price); court-issue- d 72-ho- ur rant 10:24 p.m. March 25. Brandon Vanzant (21, Price); intoxication; College of Eastern Utah campus police. . 1 Marriage licenses March 25 - Robert E. Carlson, Price, and Elaine D. Baca, Price.! March 25 - Christopher D. Durrant, Orem, and Jennifer M. Myersi ; Orem. Birth announcements Jan. 18 A girl to Ibnia and Jon Bishop, Price. March 20 A girl to Anna and Rick Sandoval, Price. March 21 - A girl to Kristie and Christopher Morgan, Ferron. I ; March 21 - A girl to Keely Hassell, Huntington. March 23 - A girl to Charity Noone, Price, and Ronald Firm; -- court-ordere- -- court-ordere- para-pliernali- a. 72-ho- Call for Nominations for Woman of the Year 1 se 1 at 1 - 1 Price. ; March 23 - A girl to Mandi Jones and Kenneth Morrill, East CarbonCity. March 24 - A girl to Sabrina Lee and Michael Morlang, Spring Glen. March 24 A girl to Laurie and Richard Safley, Price. ; -- Divorces March 20 - Douglas S. Bird vs. Jennifer Ellen Bird, married Sept! ? 1,2000 at Juab County. March 20 - Maedean Liddiard vs. Eric L Liddiard, married Dec; 21 1992 at Price. March 20 - Clayton A. Hansen vs. Samantha P. Hansen, married June 1, 1996 at Price. Editor'! note: The Sun Advocate reminds renders that bmr enforcement officers arrest suspected criminal sflenders and book the parties Into thd county Jail on alleged charges. However; onjjr prosecuting attorneys havd the legal authority to Me formal criminal com plaint a. Aa with all United States citizens, lndlvld uali appearing in the Jail heohlnga are Inaocent until proven guilty via the criminal justice system, la the event prosecutors decline to Hie complaints or esses are dismissed, individuals spprory Inf In the bookings may submit veriflcatioa to the paper: The Saa Advoi cate will print a dariflcatioa In the aext sectloa cf the Castle Uley Watch: Research report recaps Utah's wafer development history: 7:00 Sunday Matinee 2:00 Friday 7:00, Saturday & Mon.-Thur- s. SSES-- I t trJ KING K0AL Daily a Friday 9:00, Saturday y 9:00 Sunday 7:00 1 9:00 Monday-Thursda- & Death to &-'--t Returns 7:00 rVT3iV s & Smoochy E March 2kh Sturts 9:00 Ice $EZiIl The ij Rookie W E :4 it ' March 29th Starts PRICE THEATRE 30 Esst Mm. Pries 637-274- 0 All Main Saits S1.50 Daily 7:00 ONLY Harry Continues a Potter lit J private hands. An individual could sell land and retain water rights. Unappropriated water could be claimed and the county courts role became one of resolution as well as record keeping. The legislation allowed water to be divided pro rata among all primary users in case of drought or shortage. The practice sharply differed from western states adhering to the first in time, first in right method of allocation that left late- (Continued from page 1A) road, Utah opened to migrants and visitors. A key import from the East was the technical expertise of university and government scientists. A twofold problem greeted the scientists. First, water resources were alkicated via crude measurements failing to accurately account for natural variance in river flows. Second, the Utah Legislature was silent on water development. Starting in 1851 and continuing until 1875, the state turned responsibility and authority for water administration over to cities and towns. As scientific measures became more exact and experts realized resources were finite, state lawmakers passed an 1880 act to record vested water rights. The statute shifted the water ownership from the realm of the public into i comers to bear the brunt of a drought. In 1894, Congress passed the Utah Enabling Act, granting 500,000 acres of federal land to the state for water resource development. A second important occurrence was the passage of the 1894 Carey Land Act, authorizing federal land grants in arid ar-e- as and placing reclamation responsibiliton states. Local governments were charged with enacting plans fix' irrigation development and land distribution. Federal statutes and management programs in neighboring' Friends dont friends drive $3. 50 "Senior Citizens (62& over duiUj2.&J)vw.50uChlldrfln Matinee Sati4 Sun' 2 00 King Koal S3 00 ttMMl 2-- 1 (MriUNM states compelled Utah policy makers to take a more active role Coll Carbon Cab Co. 637-822- 2 - i - ? c i , in water development, indicated the foundation report But it was not until the US. Congress passed the National Reclamation Act of 1902 that water resources in Utah were systematically developed. With the egislation, Congress reaffirmed that settlement ofthe western United States was a matter of public interest And settlement could not be achieved without federal support. The act pro-vide-d funding for water resource reclamation work in 17 states. The Utah Legislature formed the arid land commission to work with the federal reclamation service in identifying projects. Due to the states sanction, the commission was able to secure more fed eral money than private water could obtain. Utah became a focal point for federal water development The largest remaining obstacle facing water development was Utahs legal framework. Congress instructed BOR tofbUow state laws and avoid initiating projects until water rights were defined and re- payment organizations established. The Utah Legislature responded by passing a fundamen-ta- l water law in 1903 to clarify and codify water issues. The basic 1903 guideline remains in effect From 1906 to 1935, Utah con- . centrated on enoouraging development and land reclamation via seeking federal funds for projects to enhance the efficiency bf water use across the state. The ideal position for state developer was to work with the federal government on jointly planned projects. ' The results were a large inventory ofdams, canals and pipe structures throughout the state and jobs fix Utahns during the Great Depression along with significant public debt in the form rtf bond issues and a direct financial obligation to the federal government. One feature ofthe US. Bureau of Reclamation involvement was the right of the federal agency to determine the price ofwater supplied by reservoirs. BOR also determined what percentage of suppliers revenues came from prop-ert-y taxes. In the early part of the century, California was already experiencing rapid population expansion. Burgeoning growth meant in- -. creased demand and the western states feared California would establish priority rights to the water in the Colorado River. Hie concern was heightened in 1922 when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the law of prior . Where can you find an Easter gift that will be treasured by anyone on your list? IK'CU has a great wav to introduce children to the rewards oi saving money. Its called the Zoo Crew Kids Cluh. Its a special savings account Cluh designed just for kids. Club members get a special membership packet, and for every dollar tlu-- deposit, they get a kids cluh point. The points can he redeemed at any time lor prizes, and prizes are available (or as little as one point. Some ol the prizes include: Art Supplies Trucks Pencils Barbie Dolls I egos Walkie Talkies, Pokcmon Cards And much more Its never ton early to get kids excited about saving, and there's never been a more rewarding way to get started. To join the Zoo Crew Kids Club, just stop by your local UCCU branch, and say I want to join the club. Call us or visit www.utahccntral.com. today at Like a curious chdcLi a devoted mother, cuv outdoor advertturer, & gardener, a newborn baby, adadi agrardpon UUJ Were in it together 494 East Main, Price 637-096-4 ' tkm into western affaire, the states started drafting a revolutionary document, the Colorado River Compact Colorado, Wyoming Utah, New Mexkn, California Nevada' signed the compact; ii) 1922. Although a participant, Arv zona would not ratify the agreed ment until 1944. I;; The compact was an agreement on the division ofwater in the Cok rado River. The agreement dU vided the states into two basins and determined how many acre feet the areas were to receive. The upper region agreed todeiiver 7.5 million basin. Duringa l&yrar period, the upper basin was required to deI liver 75 acre-fe-et The compact was supposed to give the states leeway in yeara with low water Bows. But the hydrolf ogy measures determining avaiF were taken during able acre-fethe rivers highest years and average Sow rates were going tobesig ; nificantfy lower. When die upper basin state; signed an agreement on dividing the regions water, the measurement was based on percentage of Sow rather than acre-fe- et Utafi received a 23 percent share cf thQ water allotted to the basin. ; Inresponsetoa 1935 Utah Supreme Court ruling state legisla tors included ground water undef thelawgowemingusageofthenoit; renewable resource. Ground waj terwastobe treatedno differently than other sources and the state epgineert office wasgjven attain istrative authority. The expanded jurisdiction meant state govefn ment was the final determiner, of all water rights in Utah. ; From 1935 to 1947, the Utah Legislature work to facilitate w ter development in die state. Witfi the passage of the metropolitan and water conservancy acts, th state created water districts. Th districts were recognized as inde pendent political entities with die ability to leiy property taxes and offer bond issues to fund watef projects as wdl as attract federal monies. With few exceptions, water disj tricts are managed by a board of individuals. Members are responsible to set water rate; and provide policy decisions re? ' ganhng present administration as well as future development in th$ : district Statutes and mandates at all lev els of government limit die type of policy decisions boards can mak In the majority of cases, the gen eral public does not select the boards administering die districts! Finally, the Utah Legislature attempted to address concerns of erosion, flooding and water quafe ity by creating the state soil coni seivation committee and subset .' et non-elect- a teacher, a neighbor... a friend? ...In a Bookstore of course! Walton Books Colo- rado River water Bowing through Utah could be appropriated by California long before it ever left the state's borders. Determined to avoid the situa tionand avoid federal interveh j agrardmcLi cuvarttit; aromancelover Mnnhcnhip Jnd rliwhilitv miuirrd IJT) Utah Central Credit Union appropriation applied regardl?s4 of state lines. Potentially, 637-86- 40 ; 680 W PRICE RIVER ZuiMminiiiMHimMiaMiMUMinnaaiMmisssssss!!; quent district! |