OCR Text |
Show f parties-i- RESOLUTION NO. 163 A RESOLUTION ADOPT-INA POLICY REGARDING THEISSUANCE OF INBONDS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAYTON, UTAH, that 1 Davenport at to be placed on the agenda. Following is important planning information for the Proposed Use Hearing: Amount of unapprop773-330- The City of Clearfield will hold a public hearing at Clearfield Municipal Building, 140 East Center Street, on April 20, 1982 at 5:00 p.m. for the purpose of obtaining written and oral comment from the public on the proposed uses of revenue sharing funds in the upcoming budget for Fiscal Year 1983. All interested citizens riated revenue sharing funds in the local trust $188,157 Dated this 1st day of April 1982. BONNIE S. HODGE, City Recorder Published in The Weekly flex on April 15, 1982 Issue No. 11 ReR-4- 2 ORDINANCE NO. 244 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING KAYSVILLE CITY CRIMINAL CODE 1982 FOR THE PURPOSE OF UPDATING, REVISING, CODIFYING AND COMPILING ORDINANCES -- Annual Quilt GOV-ERNIN- G CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT WITHIN KAYS- Contest VILLE CITY, PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR SUCH Coming Up Utah State University is starting to gather contestants for its annual quilt contest at the Festival of the American West, July 30 through August 7 on the USU campus. The USU Quilt Contest, organized by state and county extension agents, will feature $740 in prizes this year. A NEW category of quilts will be added to the contest this year. The Class II quilts category is for those which include machine embroidery and applique. The Class II category still requires all quilts to be hand pieced, hand appliqued, hand embroidered, or a combination of these methods using firmly Woven fabrics. The purpose of the contest is to promote traditional quilting as part of the heritage of the early Utah settlers. Quilting has long been an economical use of fabric remnants and has provided hours of home entertainment. THE USU Quilt Contest, which starts on the county level, is subject to a set of general rules. For a set of rules and entry procedures, contact Judy Stakey, extension home economist for Davis County, l Who Knows? 1. What is the 26th Amendment? 2. Define dysgraphia. 3. Northern Ohio was once the western reserve of which state? 4. What is an armada? 5. Name the eighth president of the U.S. 6. In what state is Valley Forge? 7. When was President Lincoln shot? 8. Name the assassin. Answers To Who Knows 8 year olds the right . It gave to vote. 2. The inability to write. 3. Connecticut. 4. A fleet of armed ships. 5. Martin Van Buren. 6. Pennsylvania. 7. April 14. 1865. 8. John Wilkes Booth. VIOLATIONS AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF SAID KAYSVILLE CITY CRIMINAL CODE 1982. The criminal ordinances of Kaysville City have not been updated for many years and the current criminal ordinances are in need of updating and revision and it is in the best interests of the residents and inhabitants of Kaysville City for such criminal ordinances to be revised and updated. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF KAYSVILLE CITY, a municipal corporation of the State of Utah, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The Kaysville City 1982 minal Code as revised, codified, compiled and published in looseleaf form by authority of the Kaysville City Council containing Title 58, Controlled Substances, and Title 76, Criminal Code, is hereby adopted, passed, published and declared to be the "Kaysville City Criminal 982" pursuant to and Code by the authority of the City 1 Council of Kaysville City, Utah. SECTION 2: ' All existing ordinances which are directly or expressly in conflict with the provisions of the Kaysville City Crimin1982 are hereby al Code repealed, however, all ordinances not directly or expressly in conflict with the provisions of said "Kaysville City 1982 are Criminal Code hereby saved from repeal and are hereby declared to be remaining in full force and effect. SECTION 3: The Kaysville City Criminal Code 1982" and this adopting Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon date of publication of this Ordinance one time only in the Weekly Reflex. PASSED and ADOPTED by the City Council of Kaysville City. Utah, this 6th day of April. 1982. Layton City and for the promotion of their safety, welfare, convenience and prosperity. In furtherance of the policy set forth in Section 1, the City Council declares that: 1.1 The Layton City Council will make all necessary determinations of the desirability of projects and will not delegate this determination to any agent, contractor or employee of the City. 1.2 The City will require information and proof of such matters necessary to establish the bona fide purposes of the applicant while not unnecessarily divulging information to the competitive disadvantage of the applicant. 1.3 The City will, in performing its duties, seek to protect and enlarge the good fiscal reputation of the City. By: Gerald A. Purdy, Mayor erty must have affixed thereto a zoning district classification of the City which permits the proposed project use. 2.3 The plans for the proposed project shall be in strict compliance with appropriate zoning and subdivision regulations of Layton City. 2.4 The City will review and determine the adequa- cy of water and sewer services prior to approval of the project. 2.5 The proposed project plans shall be reviewed and analyzed by the City to dee termine necessary off-sit- capital improvements in- cluding. but not limited to. streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, utility ease- lines and traffic control vices. Such analysis is for' the purpose of reporting to the City Council the impact of such development upon and facilities. The determination of which parties shall Published in The Weekly flex on April 15. 1982 Issue No. II Re- 1 . bear the cost of any reimprovequired off-sit- e ments shall be set forth in any agreement between all Regular Merchandise Thursday, Friday, Saturday April 15th, 16th and 17th KORET The Wight House 75 N. Fort Lane, Layton . Attest: Randall J. Heaps, City Recorder Published in The Weekly flex on April 15. 1982 Issue No. 11 which will not be funded by bond proceeds. If such investment entity or group has not yet been formed, the applicant must describe all proposed plans for such formation and for raising the funds thus required. 0) The designation of which local financial institution, if any, will administering bond DISTRICT All persons interested will please take notice that there has been filed with the Board of Directors of the Weber Basin Water Conservancy pro- bond principal and interest payments for the benefit of bondholders. 3.4 An application fee of $150 to defray the costs of the Citys analysis of the proposal (See also para- ' graph 3.5 hereof). 3.5 The City reserves the right to request payment from the applicant of a higher charge than the $150 application fee in order to reimburse the City for an amount equivalent to a reasonable attorney's fee in the event the City Attorney is required to spend what he believes, in his own discretion as reported to the City Council, is an unusual or tional rating documents are not available, applicant will submit financial statements including the balance sheet for the most recent fiscal and the most year-en- d recent calendar quarter and the statements of for the same periods. Such statement should either be audited or be accompanied by a certificate of a certified public accountant that the statements were pre- pared in accordance unreasonable amount of time in reviewing documents submitted by any with generally accepted accounting principles. (c) Major customers or tenants of applicant and the annual sales to each or designation of " ' party to or for the purpose of any industrial revenue bond issue, or if other legal problems arise, or if the City is required to retain outside counsel to assist in any such matters. This right may be particularly applic-- i able in the event the bond ' issue is to be sold through ian underwriter under, gir-- ;. cumstances requiring a prospectus or an offical statement in order to comply with applicable state ancF or federal securities laws, and the City is thus obli- view as appropriate other City officials. SECTION 4. CITY above-state- d ator and its relationship to applicant will be furnished along with information for such entity mination or other fea- tures which may affect the immediate environ District, Layton, Utah, for public inspection. The name of the peti NOTICE OF HEARING UPON THE REALLOCATION OF ALLOTMENTS OF WATER AND OF ITS ACCOMPANYING TAX LIENS BY WEBER BASIN WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT To all owners and lien holders interested in any portion of lands in Sections 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 25, 27, Township 4 North, Range 1 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian (North Davis area); Sections 14, 24, 25, 26, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Salt Samuel T. Vicchrilli, 5467 Knollcrest St.. Murray. UT has filed with the State Engineer Appl. No. 57277 to appropriate 0. sec. ft. of water in Davis County. The water is to be diverted from a 1 well, 400-60- 0 ft. deep, at a point N. 1100 ft. W. 200 ft. from SVi Cor. Sec. 32, T4N. R1W, SLB&M (near Kaysvill-e)- ; and used from Jan. to Dec. 31 for the domestic purposes of 1 family, stockwater 1 Farmington area). The Board of Directors of Weber Basin Water Conservancy District has heretofore made, entered and recorded its orders alloting amounts of Class D water in Davis County, Utah upon petitions which include but are not limited to the original petitions hereinafter described. Since the entry of orders making the allotments of water, the tracts of land to which the allotments were made have been divided DEE C. HANSEN, P.E. State Engineer Published in the Davis News Journal First publication April 8. 1982 Last publication April 22. 1982 7 Issue No. 12 R-3- LEGAL NOTICE SUMMONS IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF DAVIS COUNTY. STATE OF UTAH CIVIL NO. 307(H) CATHLEEN MCFARL1N. Plaintiff, vs. ERNEST G. MCFARLIN. Defendant. THE STATE OF UTAH TO ERNEST G. MCFARLIN: You are hereby summoned and required to file an answer in writing to a Complaint that has been filed with the Clerk of Davis County Court, on the above entitled case, and serve upon or mail a copy of said answer to Scott W. Holt. Plaintiff's attorney, at 26 North Main Street. Layton. Utah. 84041. If you fail to do so. judgment by default w ill be taken against you for the relief demanded in said Complaint. SCOTT W. HOLT Attorney at Law 26 North Main Lay ton. Utah 84041 4 Telephone: (801) 546-126- Published in the Davis News Journal First publication April 8. 1982 Last publication April 29. 1982 6 Issue No. 10 interest of the District that each of the allotments of water hereinabove specified be reallocated to the several tracts into which each larger tract has been divided or subdivided substantially proportionately to the area size of each smaller tract to the larger tract. The names of the original petitioners, the amount of water allotted under the original petitions, the names of the owners as of January 1, 1982, of the smaller tracts into which the tracts, and the ownership of some or all thereof have larger tracts have been divided, and the amount of water reallocated to each smaller Lake Base and Meridian (West changed, and it is in the best tract is as follows: Copies of the applications for reallocation as above set out containing the description of the land covered by the allotment under each original petition, and the description of the smaller tracts into which the larger have been divided and subdivided with proposed reallocations to each smaller tract are on file in the office of the Weber Basin Water Con- Notice is hereby given that at 9:00 a.m. on Thursday, April 29, 1982, or at such subsequent time to which 4he the District. All persons interested are invited to attend such hearing and will be heard in support or. opposition thereto. or sub-divid- into small RE- requirements 3. the City shall under this cant will not itself be the illu- ter Conservancy NOTICE TO WATER USERS Protests resisting the grant- -' ing of this application with reasons therefore must be filed in duplicate with the State En gineer, 1636 W. North Temple, SLC, UT 84116, on or before', May 22, 1982. Ordinance. If the City operating entity, a description of such oper- any unusual noise, lands to which such water has heretofore been allotted and the lands to which it is proposed the said water be transferred and the terms and conditions of which the transfer is petitioned for is on file in the office of the Weber Basin Wa- Published in the Davis News Journal First publication April 8, 1982 Last publication April 22, 1982 Issue No. 10 5 ; tion and met all of the ence in constructing,, owning, leasing andor operating projects of similar nature. If appli- nature and volume of Lake Base and Meridian, Davis County, Utah. A copy of the petition for the transfer containing the description of WEBER BASIN WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT irrigation of 7.0 acs. in W'iSE1, EV4SW14 Sec. 32, : T4N, R1W, SL&M. VIEW OF APPLICATION. 4'.1 At such time when the applicant has provided all of the required informa- conduct an analysis of the information and the suitability of the proposal for ated with the project, the Keith G. Jensen, Secretary 1 by and a designation of parties liable therefor. (h) A description of the applicant's experi- sanitary sewer, storm sewer, or ground water which may be associ- acre-fe- The Board of Directors of the District will meet in public session at the office of the District at 9:00 a.m., Thursday, April 29, 1982, to consider said petition and any and all objections that may be presented in writing by any person showing cause why said petition for transfer should not be granted. All persons interested may appear at such hearing and show cause in writing why said petition, or any thereof, should not be granted. Failure of any person to show cause in writing as aforesaid, shall be deemed an assent on his part to the granting of said petition. The Board will at such meeting, or at a subsequent meeting adjourned therefrom, accept or reject the petition. Apr. for the supplemental ; 3.6 Other information of Section charges into the air, Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-da- y Saints, a corporation Sole 20.0 1 specifically desired by the City Council not set forth above. 3.7 All of the documents and information required above shall be submitted to the office of the Mayor, who will then request re- tirement of the bonds, through (d) of this section 3.3. (i) A description of other experience of ap- plicant andbr any of its affiliates in sponsoring other industrial revenue bond issues from other cities, counties, universities, or industrial authorities of any nature in Utah or in any other state, including a state- ment of the present status of any such issues. 0) A description of the anticipated environmental impact on the im- -' mediate area surrounding the proposed project and on Layton City, generally, including, but not necessarily limited to, estimates of the increase in pedestrian and vehicular traffic, the nature and volume of dis- District, a petition applying for the transfer of an allotment of Weber Basin water from lands in Section 15, Township 3 North, Range 1 West, Salt of the 3 formation and expenditure of time of its Attorney or other staff members. officers, if applicant is a corporation, or general partners, if applicant is a general or limited partnership. (e) A report showing the impact of the project on Layton City by way of jobs, sales and property tax revenue. Also other sensible business. (f) Applicant's pro forma balance' sheets, income statements and cash flow projections for the proposed project for the next five (5) years, reflecting the proposed revenue bond issue. (g) A payment schedule or formula for re- in Corporation ing 10 cattle; and from to Oct. gated to provide greater than the usual amount of in- cluding directors and re- - 0 tioners and the amount of wafor which the ter, in acre-fee- t, transfer applies is as follows: WATER CONSERVANCY ceeds and receiving financial position. If such bank letter or na- Re- NOTICE OF FILING OF TRANSFER OF CLASS D ALLOTMENT BY WEBER BASLN serve as trustee for nt subparagraphs (a) All LEWIS G. SHIELDS, Mayor partners- proposed capital or operating cost items cant should also provide a Dun and Bradstreet Report or other equivi-lanational rating of its equivalent to that O Off maining portions. DATED this 20th day of March, 1980. syndicate or other investment group associated with or controlled by applicant, for furnishing the equity portion of the construction costs, operating capital, equipment or furnishings, or any other from the applicant's principal banker concerning the applicant's financial position and ability to meet the expense of the proposed bond issue. The appli- quired for applicant Q al, such decision shall not affect the validity of the re- hip, other revenues from other municipal services Attest: V. Dean Steel. City Recorder ture, limited to-w- it: SECTION 2. CITY PLANeach. If such names of NING CRITERIA. customers are certified 2.1 All proposed projects by the applicant to be so shall be in accordance with confidential that discloand shall meet the goals, sure would create some concepts and objectives for competitive disadvan- development as set forth ip , v , tage, the applicant will the Comprehensive Master provide other summary Plan. descriptions of the na2.2 The property on ture and source of its inwhich any such project is to come. be located must be within (d) A resume of printhe corporate boundaries of cipals and key emLayton City and such propployees of applicant, in- ments, water and sewer KAYSVILLE CITY 1 nefit of the inhabitants of en- vironmental study or impact statement, but must furnish reasonable, credible, good faith estimates of such environmental factors. (k) A summary of the proposed use, if applicable, of any joint ven- within the intent and meaning of the Industrial Facilities Development Act. 3.2 Evidence that the proposed bond issue can be sold through an acceptable underwriter or to an experienced investor or group of investors and a description of the proposed method of marketing and the identity of persons or firms to be responsible for bond sales. 3.3 A written application containing the following information, (a) A history of the applicant including a description of its operations. (b) A written report amended. This policy is adopted in furtherance of the primary objectives to mitigate - the serious threat of extensive unemployment, to secure and maintain a balanced and stable economy, to amerliorate pollution and other environmental problems and to provide for the public welfare. All such action provided under this policy as set forth herein in Chapter 17 shall be taken only when the same is exercised for the be- - fully engineered proposal falls Bonds pursuant to the Industrial Facilities Development Act as set forth in Title II, Chapter 17, U.C.A. 1953, as work with the applicant and with an investment banker, the trustee and bond counsel suitable to the applicant and to the City. SECTION 5. VALIDITY OF ORDINANCE If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held or decided to be invalid or unconstitution- graph, the applicant is not required to furnish a Council, stating that the the policy of Layton City, State of Utah, to encourage the The City Attorney will tion, as distinguished from the operation, of the project. For the purpose of this subpara- municipal bond counsel, acceptable to the City issue Industrial Revenue upcoming fiscal year, groups, senior citizens and senior citizens organizations are encouraged to attend the hearing. Persons attending the hearing shall have the right to provide written and oral comments and suggestions regarding possible uses of revenue sharing funds. Contact Rod Layton City hereby does adopt the following policy regarding the issuance of Industrial Revenue Bonds. SECTION I. DECLARATION OF POLICY It is hereby declared to be location, relocation, or expansion of manufacturing, industrial or commercial enterprises within the corporate limits of the City, and to that end to fund, $112,067 Amoun t of revenue sharing funds expected to be received during the ment, and a statement of any unusual problems which may be associated with the construc- interest. SECTION 3. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS In order to properly process and consider applications to issue bonds' for projects set forth herein, certain criteria, procedures, guidelines and requirements shall be followed and submitted by the applicants as set forth below: 3. 1 Legal opinion from an attorney who is qualified G DUSTRIAL REVENUE HEARING ON PROPOSED USE OF REVENUE SHARING f i 1 . Council finds the proposal meets all of the requirements and is acceptable to the Council, a Resolution of ' Intent shall be issued after the proper legal procedures have been followed. 4.2 Recognizing that in ; some circumstances time may be of the essence to the success of a project and adoption of the Resolution of Intent, the City Council may elect to adopt such Resolution before all of the information above required is furnished if it reasonably appears that such information can be furnished before the Bond Ordinance will be prepared reserving the right to not issue said bonds or pass said ordinance if the information is not produced to the satisfaction of the Council. 4.3 Any Resolution of In- tent passed by the City Council will automatically expire six (6) months after date of passage unless the request or prior to the six (6) months expiration date shows sufficient cause to the Council why the expiration date should be ex- tended. If sufficient cause is shown, the Council may extend the six (6) month expiration date any length of time. 4.4 If the City Council has considered the application and has adopted a Resolution of Intent to isssue the proposed bonds, it shall direct the City Attorneys office to request that documents for the bond issue be prepared by bond counsel. servancy District at the in- tersection of Hill Field Road and Highway 89 in Davis County, Utah and may be in- spected by any interested person. hearing may be adjourned the Board of Directors of the Weber Basin Water Conservancy District will meet in public session at the office of the District as aforesaid to consider the applications for reallocations and to consider making its orders reallocating the water and the liens covered thereby in accordance with the applications for reallocation or such other order or orders as it deems in the best interest of : Keith G. Jensen, Secretary WEBER BASIN WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT Published in the Davis News Journal First publication April 8, 1982 Last publication April 22, 1982 Issue No. 10 R.39 |