| Show FILE ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT keith obrien company deny that they bought sl st z worth WO a sh shar ar the helth 0 drien brien comp r atad bd its board of dime dimetory tors liao hao flit r sl au awer in the district distri Lt court at st S S iok laic city to the action bro broucht tight agunat thein them by H A nelson manager of the wasatch stores in which he lie seeks to recover reemer the bovil aum suni of 2250 alleged to bo be the milne alue of 2221 shares hares of the capital stock of defendant compi iu which ho lie alleges waa was wrongfully appropriated by defend ants to their own use at the time of t the alleged co conversion merston to claimed by plaintiff plaint lIT that the idock bo be agad to plaintiff AV IV NI obrien Ol kien may mity E my ton wife of 11 11 31 too ton mrs A 11 tarbet and maria A mostyn oven but their bae been assigned to t plaintiff defendants admit I 1 the persons nain named edere were the owner said block istock hut deaoy that it vos of the value of iw per share and allege that it wag worth onia 25 per share they also deny that they wrongfully appropriated the same but allege ly that they purchased it at a sale fer for delinquent assessments oo 00 march 8 1004 it 14 aimed rimed that an assessment of M 0 rent of the value tat tie of the stock was wits ot od by the board bo rd of directors la issuance to t authority given the oard of directors by loy an articles of lacor pa caration ration the salo sale of the stock took place on june 6 1004 and the assessment being unpaid on all the stock mentioned la in plaintiffs complaint the same was purchased by defendants for forth the amount of the tile assessment due on n the ib same defendants accordingly ask that plaintiff take nothing by hie his complaint and that they be awarded their costs I 1 in U the action |
