Show t V 40 VAIr D asa or asa arrested 4 ilela ilaf i ow rotor A francis of minnie mond r tamed bom home this weak elc after twin being ab batyst 6 e yuad and diso orvol joho toba I 1 ito aa aad faill preparing to leave 10 P V junction y I 1 11 TM be w baj strange from the tb pt fact that they kai had leared inured down to his X I january nod pd made arrangements ato rh tk fann fur ayr mr 4 bot is to and fiand to and 40 0 o be he claims that a great of his goods in act hearly very mai mutable mg table bid had in imo br i other taken leave 1 place the i rob bal bai sons one lota into 1 find ad pel pets came hillot in hot penult thy they were later inter COP W at aih ill depot dt her here jast just on the ere re led oa a R 0 ewt ir s and nd the tb sheriff with A a arch among their hatta hM tel which revealed a az load of articles artic tee claimed by franci francis the parties won wort placed under arriet and end taken the next morning to spring ulen glen where they were arraigned before ast justice vu oa a cl tr cl larceny and isad to prove the Q 6 kletthe pro property retty la ill question lie offering inventory rill will five the reader ian idea ides of at the th sada which were piled up in I 1 ills middle of the floor of the court there wets several mattross mattro sm pillow pillows quilts blankets sheets bed spreads tablecloths table cloths Klu glam ware aware tiB skates pistols tole spurs toy toys wo x ornaments dinner belli bell etc ariff docent charles t fred brames I rames P A lF mr mrs J U 11 brown and J ac were bamin t ad d by M X P dreffer and J W wrt wart for the th prosecution nearly every question asked the th wu was obbo objected tea to by attorney loffmin for the df danse ens bat but 4 at t the th conclusion ot of their testimony the coart decided that the property bad been boen k a doubt and ordered it turned to mr oa 01 at this ite stage of the proceedings the bearing came to a clow close and court ad joames until saturday morning when the parties will ansberto anwer answer to an amended complaint charging thein then with mettr it ii Is eTt Ident that the reava K the charge petty instead of gra taj larceny lar cray Is the defendants defend anti keys 1 a family of three young children with them aad and this fact brings forth the sympathy yB pathy of the raple mr francis claims many other othel things are missing sad buhela he is tasking t fiorta to fin an I 1 oat out where they are cached mr wrid 1 hn mrs hare as yet given no 1 ill 0 ir mae for their action actions but ra they 7 1111 1 pro try to zhon ora e t euti selles at the trial 1 it wili will bo be but faar far to state ekit I 1 tl 14 thal plaat utin u Ilter of the articled arti clee cleli are personal property and that mr ir arg cis d save them of other hers they W also 10 lo claim that francia wanted to marry tf their idaet daughter danh ter and because of s their th Artict not consenting ho he it is prosecuting them thera spitefully however ebli may be j a the th if locka very dark against tee de fenda adanti ada ats oti aad and the outcome will bo await 4 I 1 lAte test e |