Show REMOVAL OP OF registered VOTERS seems to be some confusion of mind in regard to the legal voting place of electors who have moved f from rom the pe precinct in which they were registered since the date f for or the rectification of the registration lists it has we been stated that suck suc persons have lot lost their right to vote in any precinct Is manifestly absurd the law is mods aade for the protection of citizens citizen 1 not tw ft the destruction of their rights at the time of the regular registration it to the duty of the registration officer after in each cach precinct to see that the names of voters who have moved from his precinct are off the list and that voters moved into his precinct are ave upon the list in case he fails 0 W o do WB or removals take place wordy after the revision voters re moving from one preci precinct tiet to another I 1 can appear mam before the registrar and ole list corrected providing this i is done before the revised list is com iiii lete el dand filed with the clerk cherkof of the court suppose se a voter ate aae pree precinct act I 1 la in which he was t ered since that time and is Ut fore unable to get his name erred does he lose loae his right to WIT certainly not but bat he must the precinct where he Is reg M for r the simple reason that only wfred voters can cast their ballots I 1 W la law requires their names to be art rk oa the registration list if 14 gilld offer their ballots in a pre 0 list of which their names taw beai the judges of election woold wap ave to reject their votes but W a 4 ear and offer their ballots n ue reci act where they are the judges of election DIA cm not lot eject their votes on the ground th they have moved from the ale the revision of the list the 6 Is ia no iw for such re pC HOft A not hold bold in such let must be for ats W wa an oath has been rge e of ak t and that con U alon ti oa that he has re sided 4 of utah for six an ot passed and in the apra SS on 5 month immediately immediately tug the d att hereof his residence aar the itte wh when en he took the sa catl and d le ceding the elec IN knothe 1110 matter entirely jle he oc liobe ChAll ked Aged for non real resl ea idea the y before taking the i lit presented ted for f or berj perjury ary it if he goolt tala ely at it lie he moves out ut of the precinct where he registered after the filing of the list with the he county clerk there is no way to make the tran transfer fer on the list until the next revision sign which will not occur until next year it is clear therefore that such voters must cast cas their ballots in the precincts where they were registered and that no one has the right to hinder or obstruct their voting if such obstruction st Is attempted the offender is liable to prosecution and aad any judge of election aiding in the obstruction can also be prosecuted and sued tor lor damages as well what the law may be in some other territory i or state has no bearing on the elec election tion laws of f force orce in utah persons who cite them as regulating our local affairs simply display gross ignorance the utah commission has fees feen quoted as authority for views dif berent from the tenor of the law but no such expressions have come from that body officially so far as we have heard and we do not believe there has been any such renunciations enunciations either privately or publicly let every voter go to the polls on monday next the first day of august and be sure to vote in the precinct where his hia name appears on the 1 registration list and let him also be sure to vote the ticket he wishes to sustain and not be deceived or hindered or bamboozled bamboozler by any liberal trick or trickster of any name station or profession f fes sion registered voters have legal rights and they should be prepared to exercise and maintain them inviolate |