Show THE A caa r A ata w commissions TH q complaint COM h the defense in the above case occur pled most moat of yesterday afternoon a presentation ot of their side of the trouble under aim after t they ahey concluded commissioner backay took the whole matter under f ment until this morning at 11 go when he be rendered the following Howing fb dechal becis dec lal ii the plaintiff WA cue case 1 V 1 jaw W lit in the united sestet court otty city and county of ft WS lake Lak cand and of utah US ah v before re wm win mckay esq o gil gilmore v I 1 action for damage 0 burs J the motion of atte to dismiss plaintiffs cimpl complaint t t cause it appears upon the he i face olai i tha it that plain plaintiff 2 failed and ne 9 le get two disinterested pers persons a of precinct to appraise the damages alleged to have been he and nd to give sad plaintiff a t thereof ereon in writing under tbell b daiv within 10 days alter after the time 1 4 tig H lead was do 0 lp it ia because said paid plaintiff plaint liff failed an and jofh jetted to ave uch certificate it ivi were made mcany the herein as part thereof as S sec 17 C chap p 8 6 1 laws ava 0 of lowed a tug ing bye faderson p A J a adoo 01 a similar F fuestion raised th p statute to in t the e first cobit at ogden W WM m MCKAY Kc KAY commissioner dated april |