Show substitute attachment BILL FOLLOWING is ia the th substitute for mar attachment bill which was killed in the house it was introduced by the house judiciary committee and passed the lower branch of the A assembly yesterday A BILL amending section of an act en titled an act revising Ke the bode of civil procedure of utah territory orv relating elating li to attachments SECTION 1 bel it enacted by bu the governor and le legislative ve assembly of the territory of utah that section ol of an act entitled an act revising the code of civil procedure of utah territory approved march 13 1884 be and is hereby amended by repealing all after the word cases in tile ane sixth line of said section and enacting in hi lieu thereof the following in an action upon a judgment or upon a contract express or implied which is not secured by any mortgage or lien upon real or personal property situate or being in this territory or if originally so secured when such security has without any act of the plaintiff or of the person to whom the security tyL was gives given become valueless against a defendant who 1st ast Is not residing in or ad stands in defiance of an officer or conceals himself so that process cannot be served upon him or ad has assigned disposed of or concealed or is about to assign dispose of or conces conceal ialy any of his bis property with intent to defraud defraud his bis creditors or ath has departed or is about to depart from the territory to the injury ary of his creditors or ath fraudulently contracted the debt deb t or incurred the obligation respecting which the action is brought provided that hereafter in the cases mentioned in subdivision sab division 3 4 and 5 of this section the cause of act action ion shall be deemed to have occurred and the debt or obligation to be due any agreement of the parties to the contrary notwithstanding the constitution of the united states declares that no BO state shall pass a law impairing the of contracts suppose a case like this A man incurs a debt an element of ef the contract being that be shall pay the same in one year but some time prior to the maturity of the obligation he sees fit to remove from the territory such removal being to the injury of his creditors 11 cynthe can the obligation of the contract contracts be so impaired as ad to make the delat due before the time stipulated and hence before the debtor can under established principles of commercial law and practice be presumed to have prepared himself to meet it any business uan man knows what hardship may result from making a debt collection by an attachment suit some length of time before the debtor expected to be called upon to meet inett it barring the question raised by the closing proviso the bill is excellent an one As that clause appears to contain a doubtful provision would it not be proper for the council to consider the advisability of et striking it out |