Show COURT proceedings 0 in 0 chief justice anes zincs court thle this morning the divorce suit of matthew E coleman vs vo mignonette coleman was waa heard au an annulment of the marriage was sought on the ground of desertion the parties were married III this city on feb ath 1889 the di d fend fen danid anVe manner was waa too frivolous to suit her husband who a and he objected to her gadding abiud abacut JI 1 to this mrs coleman rejoined that she ebe would go where she could have unrestricted liberty and fl foully ully in feb 1892 left him the plaintiff plaint ff stated that nis wife had since been living at a house of ill III repute on prank lin avenue ainsworth Aina worth who resides in the twenty brat ward said he was waa acquainted quain ted with the parties who were gormerly lor neighbors neigh bore of his on one siou witness was passing along alone franklin Fra avenue and observed observe cl coleman standing at the door of is a alienable house there when she g observed him she ran inside and slain slammed nied the door you are sure it was her and that zane it was waa a bawdy house asked judge witness was sure as to that and volunteered this additional tion amid the laughter of the court she dhe was dressed in a red dress and had a pair of goldena golden 9 slippers on judge zane bolden slippers I 1 I hia jig honor thought bought this pretty conclusive testimony and said to the counsel well wei you can take your decree mr A C eichnor was the plain tiff P a attorney HE OAME CAME WEST BUT SHE aon jan the ground of desertion also E best sought a divorce from duale ja best beet who did aid nut not appear in ILI answer to tn the plaintiff stated that he maur mar ried the defendant at long islands island NY in december 1889 on the day of the marriage bowe however verp he left hla hix wife by mutual consent and came cabrae west he sent her money regularly until january in the present year but she positively refused to come and join him though he be had repeatedly asked her to do so I 1 the court iz ranted the decree as aa prayed boom lice lee and gray were attorney P miscellaneous J T belies vs va henry denhalter default and decree ot foreclosure granted henry dinwoodey vs va john T match oil ell et a al leave to amend complaint plaint was given give a by making frank knox 6 a part arty Y defendant henry W watson vs ve the utah aur nu sery ery company fifteen days time granted to answer THAT RAILROAD there were a number of attorneys present who wanted to Q in introduce their respective mo lions but the court having set g apart the day fir the hearing of the he arguments ete etc in the railroad case they were informed that ever every athing thine else must be pawed passed over until that had been disposed of the title of the suit in question was a that of the salt lake ana los angeles railroad company vs ve salt lake city anti and the oregon short line anti and utah northern northen railway company the particulars have been already tore fore shadowed in these columns it was alleged by the plaintiffs that their surveyed and adopted line runs across the defendant railway companas comp anys track on temple street between sixth and seventh west at an angle of 18 degrees and likewise across a portion of sixth west street between temple and first south which plain A miffs tiffs desire to use that the crossing of this hie track and use of that part of the street was WAR necessary to plaintiffs as a right of way for their railroad and for the purpose ose of connection with the rio blo grand western railway and thereby to reach their depot in this city plaintiffs went on to say bay that they have repeatedly peat edly petitioned the city council for a franchise authorizing them to cross cloea anti and use the streets named but that that body has refused refu seil to grant araia the same game despite that plaintiffs have no depot facilities whatever and were unable to obtain any unless they secured a right of way as prayed the eastern end of plaintiffs plaintiff track was now on the west side of fourth west street near the middle of south temple J where their present franchise terminates term injates thus they had bad to use a portion of cf south temple street for the loading and unloading of their oars can and for depot purposes which WAS not only an inconvenience to plaintiffs ate but must detrimental to the public they hatt had sought to make arrangements with the oregon short line sad and utah northern railway co for the crossing of that companas comp anys track at the place mentioned but had been unable to do so BO during durina this year the plaintiffs say their business will consist chiefly of arry log passengers to saltair beach and they would be unable to ti accommodate patrons or carry on their business successfully without proper depot facilities hence they pray that cheuse the use of the undo lands add promises premises designated be decreed as 8 necessary to their use also a right of way anu and crossing over the defendant railway companas comp anys track that the court determine the be conditions cupoli which plaintiff may cross the thoroughfares to a connection with this the tracks of the rio grande western and that they be granted the use upon uch such co conditions as may be just and counsel in the case are hou hon F 8 Bic bards and banuett Ben uett marshall and bradley for the plaintiff williams and van cott and judge hoge are for the defendants 93 richards insisted that inasmuch as ape plaintiffs had not sufficient time to construct a depot belore the opening of the bathing season which would be bome ome time during the present month it was important that the matter at issue should receive immediate consideration aeration era tion he therefore asked the court to ito grant the prayer contained la in the for por the defense it was argued by attorney Lt torney P L williams that the grossing crossing of the other company s track by the plaintiffs at the point indicated was waft unnecessary and that the action of the depot was due to plaintiffs sloth eloth and indolence mr richards intimated that he would w have hae something to say on that point later the case is likely to occupy the whole of the day ANOTHER TO FOLLOW the baft like lake and los angeles railroad road company vs robert alvin atre is another suit to be tried at the conclusion of the foregoing plaintiffs have instituted condemnation pro feedings edings oe es against the defendant and the of this grievance was given in the columns of the NEWS a day or two ago COURT NOTES in the case of merchant corn com pany vs the E 0 coffin hardware company vom pany the defendants defendant 8 have confessed judgment for lia la justice gees court the northwestern barb wire corn com pany have filed an action against united states marshal benton in the third district court to recover alleged to be due for the conver conversion siou of certain property at ogden on april 27 dey street are the plaintiffs plaintiff attorneys in the case of george brennan charged with perjury a jury wa waa em paneled and several witnesses examined when a defect was discovered in D the indictment the defense asked that the jury be instructed to bring in a verdict of not guilty but this request was denied and on motion of mr stephens leave was given to resubmit the case to the grand jury in the third district court yesterday afternoon the case of frank edgington charged with attempted arson was wail called up the alleged crime was committed in davis county on march 11 1892 the defendant la where about however were not learned un iii some after the indictment when he be was waa apprehended in this city by deputy marshal goodsell Goode elJ he was then placed under bonds and released but during the criminal hearing in february of the present year the bonds were declared forfeited owing to the fact that he was absent when called for trial on february he was brought into court by his bis bon bondsmen demen 1 the default set aside and since that tha I 1 time he has been in the penitentiary awaiting a hearing at the trial yesterday the court instructed the jury to bring in a verdict of not guilty |