Show JUDI JUDICIAL C IAL FAIRNESS a I 1 THE fl first charge of judge ander alider son to a utah jury appears in ahlo issue of the Dim it Is w fair concise and Im impartial partIA and gives evidence of a clear clea r judida judi mind free from blas bias and of course this is to be expected of an official whose office implies ira iba partiality but utah has so ofton 0 the t from i witnessed gross attacks bench upon ulion the views and alleged all doings of a elms class that stoned and strictly proper dudlo judi utterances are noticeable is one parag foh of the charge particularly worthy of attentions attention legal e you can receive none but in evidence and the best beat evidence ev ideno degree to the exclusion of beana or secondary evidence this is sound and necessary nece sOrY a 1 vice in times past many bills and aln been found upon hearsay wit the mere belief of prejudiced nesses these were in cases CO ases undo un ai the edmunds act and I 1 the he act 1887 in that class of cases it seeded to be the rule that special met hoda and special rules were not only f aible but desirable bythe by the pl buting officers grand juries ju ha been selected with the view to flud find indictments to in particular line the endea adarA thread of testimony 9 was 0 deemed sufficient and artl r t A w summoned were required obo ay facts were unk unknown to tell they believed or suspected ted x and ja pay frequently formed the only W tion for an indictment the y at the last term tera of bour TV chief justice publicly 03 opinion that indictments bad dently been framed without jf do A 1 V I legal ground and cases t 1 into court without cause iw r time conviction would have A 7 had upon them from juries da because they were we in mth the prosecution but at the last term a number of those brought to trial were dismissed or a verdict of acquittal yas was rendered let us ape that the day is past when an cusati oh under the edmunds act w to a conviction 4 paragraph worthy of saw attention is this rt ayou ou are not bound to hear evince for forthe the defendant but it is your jetty jt duty tty to weigh all the evidence romed to you and when you ve reason to believe that other evidence Ovi dence thin your reach will exom ay y the charge you should order fuch SU ch evidence to be produced aad y for tb that t purpose oae may require the dilated arr ce ted S states attorney tor ney to issue pro for the witness 11 this is not new but it is some ti aing og that tha st grand juries here rarely into effect they should shoula be lhote anxious to arrive at a just conn as to the probabilities that an anae against the law has been buted nU ted than to alle up indict olento nd send cases to court evi dabaco ace to explain away a flimsy e ought to be desired aad ob ned and innocent persons ought wv to be compelled compe Hed to suffer the rin and expense of a trial to tova YO their innocence of a trumped up P accusation co prompted by spite or y au 1111 inordinate ordinate appetite for fees A fair enforcement of the laws as they annl are enforced elsewhere will lot 1 w e complained of by reasonable ere no matter how severe BO 46 ot the ille laws awa may be considered iti t 18 judicial and executive partials y and vindictiveness against a class of Offe offenders that are complained of ud ought not to exist in any ot this s country where au all citi 0 the ti 18 supposed to be equal before we law scent recent date this judicial dis lias has been greatly relieved of proprieties and we are sa s1 to see that the present I 1 n of the bench starts out to fo unbiased obstructions th the ahli 8 inquisitorial body dy upon pon 14 as the judge has well said atoa accent to a large degree the ef of eya of odthe the statutes the th y bory united states and of the ter y f or r the preservation of the ce W d good order of kocl society ety |