Show THE MURDER CASE RO no justification yet developed for the defense the prosecution inthe mulloy malloy mur dorcase der case closed its testimony today with the account of policeman wm H bennett of park city who detailed the account of the arrest he arrived on the ground a low few minutes after the shooting and saw Mullo sweeney e he asked them who did dia jt it and they said they did not know mulloy SRI said someone inside did it the 0 officer went inside and there learned that it was mulloy malloy himself who tired the shot when he came back mulloy and sweeney were sone gone and a man told him which way the defendant went he followed him or yards and ordered him to stop slop and to take his his hand out of his bis pocket mulloy again denied the shooting lagand and said he be was not armed the ef officer licer ba hoever hw wever ever took from the defendants pocket a 41 cali ber colts double action revolver which was loaded with the exception of one chamber that had in it an empty shell recent recently jy discharged when this was shown to mulloy malloy he be confessed and said he would shoot any man who challenged him out witness placed his prisoner in a cell heard beard the shouts of lynch him as he took him past the crowd mr varian forthe defense asked that the prosecution be required to call all the wiLu witnesses esses that were before the gra grand ad jury the request was de died led the usual statement before oe opening na the case was omitted and 0 8 harper called as the first witness he teal t ded 1 was a witness for the prosecution grand jury and corn maj way was to in the alleyway oo on august arst when tb the Is took place bard moffat say let ahem hem KO go out ont and light it if ibey want to ta the saloon heard mulloy ask hushes hughes tu so 0 out into the tae yard hughes said le e was waa not afraid of anything from a toothpick to a six pound cannon ball cross croaa exam I 1 ned when a hushes hughes said he was not afraid mulloy sald said let us as go out then did not hear bear mulloy malloy call hughes a liar or a coward several witnesses were called call edito to show that the defendant had borne a good character previous oua to the shoot inc in the he efforts of the defense thus far appear to ue oe sim simply ply to obtain a modification of the verdict from that of murder marder in the first degree Evi evidence depee contradictory of that put in by the prosecution may ho he idever yet be introduced trod |