Show THE difference WILL the tribune go into conniptions over the outrage upon mr william burbidge who was taken before the grand jury by mistake having been summoned at an early hour of the morning the blander was less pardonable aban the error when one farrell was taken for another in that case it was only the difference of an initial in this there are differences of both christian name and surname in neither case was the wrong intentional but bat when committed by a policeman it was an aa outrage against the man his family and alf and when perpetrated pet by a deputy marshal ft it is all right and calls for no comment from the organ of the lechars lechers and of the F 0 Hs when J J farrell was taken for J W farrell its columns teemed day after daywitt day with abuse of the local officers and the whole mormon community the mistake was manipulated into a deliberate plot to smirch the mans character and ruin him in the eyes of his family and there were calls for vengeance and reparation but now that william bar burbidge bidge Is taken for charles burgess there is silence in the organ an afo aforesaid repaid and not evea the feet is to ivay flay nothing of fossand fuss and feathers about outrage its funny fanny quite funny I 1 very very vert funny |