| Show SELF CONVICTED OP OF LYING AGAIN 1 tile THE daily ian ign slanderer tan derer alias tribune of this city cannot or will not state any fact in controversy without either squarely liln lying about it or so misrepresenting it that the deception amounts to the same thin thing as a lie this mora ing in replying to the remarks of the NEWS about the passing passin of the juror beers by consent of the court after h be e had confessed to an opinion against the defendant which the court considered actual bias the slanderer said the uron uror upon making the statement was discharged a fact which the NEWS must have known but mut it could think bano of no other means through which to throw out its Us daily sneer at the court 1 this so po called I 1 fact I 1 is contrad contradicted isted I 1 the slanderers stander Slander ers ghr own report of the matter it is there shown that mr beers beels was Ivas challenged for implied bias and the challenge was overruled that he lle v as then ther challenged for actual abias and lud tise tte challenge was overruled its report says bays jud judge jude e zane I 1 overrule the chil lenge it appears the juror is too anxious to be relieved from duty A recess was then theli taken until 2 in the report of the afternoon proceedings ce in the same sheet after considerable sid erable business had bad been transacted it says J J Fa farrell freil frell J T beers B E R fitzgerald and charles connor believed it was wrong for a manao man to have living and more than one wife at the same time and were all ali passed sor for cause I 1 here herel then the paper which declares deci that beers I 1 was discharged upon mak ing his statement showing actual bias in another part of the same issue reports that he be was passed when writing for inside matter the scribes of that mendacious concern should examine its hinder parts so as not to convict itself too plainly of lying the same report says the defense exercised its first peremptory challenge on J T beers thus it appears from its own columns co that thad ii istead instead of the juror beers being discharged upon making his statement challenges based on that statement were overruled he be was accepted and passed as a juror by the prosecution and the court just as we bald but afterwards it appears that the defense exercised ri at 0 peremptory challenge which neither the pros prom cut cution cutson on nor the court could deny and only on that ground was the juror juron excused excuse ct the tribune has become so reckless in lying alyin that it continually exposes and refuted refute 4 its own statements one more instance will suffice for to today dailia day dax we exposed the tribunes fais false faise ec charges ages against the jurors who did not decide according to its dictation one jurors disagreement it exl exi explained oil on the ground that he owned large herds of stock and was afraid the 64 mormons cormons Mor mons would injure it it lias has been proved that the man noes not own any stock in n the territory so the slanderer bay say sas s this morning I 1 the reason that another juror was put ut down as a stockman stock man was because re he has been such for several years past and men who knew him well had never heard of his giving up the bustness business A little further on in the same article it teays says we have nothing to take back nothing to regret and nothing to explain n away of what we said isaid of those ilose jurord jurors an we e ard are sustained fully b by the best an and most conservative men of the city ll 11 the fal fai falsehood about this juror cannot be bd denied and yet it takes nothing back and has nothing to explain away after alten floundering about ill tit lathe the paragraph we haye clipped and now wants the public bublic to believe that the best men in t the e city sustain it in wilful falsehoods about mens private affairs and i shameful assaults upon gentlemen in I 1 the discharge of a sworn dut duty there never neier never was a more gnp unprincipled paper published on the face of the earth |
