Show 7 SUPREME COURT CALENDAR TWENTY SEVEN DOWN FOR HEARING The regular june term of the supreme court of utah opened this afternoon at 1 in hi the district court room the first xen ten cases ou on the following calendar are the ones te oed of at last term the new cases beginning ginnia with eleventh one on the list lesti 1 edward anthony etal et al respondents vy vs charles it savage a appellant from third district marshall royle royie for respondent hoe jonasson for appellant 2 allen alien G campbell et al appellants vs thomas taylor respondent from second Di district strict denny hall and marshall marshan for appellants sutherland mcbride for respondent 3 james ewin ewing respondent vs edgar markley appellant from first district it smith for respondent kimball heyword for appellant 4 bedell smith appellant vs E A ireland respondent from first district lili illi williams 1111 auls auis remick hemick for appellant kimball Iley wood for respondent 6 5 alvin D bowers respondent vs U P 11 it co appellant from first district felshaw brown for res pod dent williams youn young for appel ant 6 james af M barlow appellant vs alexander ramsey etal et al respondents froia frota third district bennett harkness kirkpatrick rosborough Ilos llos boroug merritt sheeks rawlins for appellant dickson varian and hoge t jonasson for respondents 7 mary ann M pratt appellant vs alexander alexinder ramsey et al respondents rom from f third district same attorneys as in last cause 8 jesse jcsse J murphy appellant vs alex ramsey kamsey et ct al respondents from third district same samo attorneys as in last case 9 mildred E randall et ct al appellants s aiex alex ram ramsey sey et ek dents from third district same came attorneys tonnie asin as in last carl cari cause se 10 ellen elien ilen llen C clawson et ct al appellants vs alex aiex ramsey et al respondents from third district district same atti attl attorneys meys as in last cause 11 the people of the territory of utah respondents vs rudolph smith appe appellant ej lant from third district W 11 dickson for respondent dark kenner tod fod appellants I 1 I 1 12 the people of the territory of utah respondents vs frederick llo lio llope t appellant from third district W WH 11 dickson for respondents snyder van home tot tor or appellants appell ants II 13 11 the people etc respondents vs patrick callahan callaghan impleaded impleader Im pleaded impleaded im etc appellant from second district IV H dickson zera snow shiow for fon respondents arthur brown for appellant 14 the people etc respondents vs david fenniell Fen een neif helf pleaded impleaded Im etc appellant from second district WIL 11 dickson zera snow lor respondents arthur brown for appellant ia 45 the people ex rel rei christian respondents spon dents vs wms cox box appellant from f rom second district sutherland royle and Lo lochrie chrle chrie for respondents kenner merritt and kirkpatrick for foral forai appellants pel pei lante iante ische people ex rel compson respondents spon dents vs john M R coombs appellant bellant ye llant ilant from second district lct iet sutherland royle royie and lochrie for respondents kenner merritt and kirkpatrick for appellants I 1 17 john W lowell et ct al respondents cespon vs james T parkinson etal ct al from third district hoge hoe ann and respondents I 1 loffman for appellants i 18 thomas F enton respondent vs salt lake county appel appellant lanta from third district j 1 D loinaz lor respondent pon dent Z snow for appellant 19 allen alien G campbell et etal al respondents vs thomas taylor appellant from second district marshall royle and hall marshall for respondents sutherland mcbride for appellant 20 john felt respondent vs win wm it djudd judd appellant from first district N tanner jr for respondent T burmester for appellant 21 silas reid rehl appellant vs nsf F W jiava et eit al respondents from first district aw A brown for appellant zera snow for respondents 2 the da ry itly co respondent vs john IV small et ct al ap appellants P e 1 1 from ad district ls is lil ill 11 j 4 1 r k patrick for respondent sheeks rawlins for appellants i 23 A Christop christopher hei madsen respondent vs F R iten lien n er a from district jacob johnson for respondent spon dent darke darjea kenner lor for appellant 24 samuel levy respondent vs salt lake city a appellant from third district sutherland Wand mcbride for respondent sheeks shocks rawlins for appellant 25 andrew appellant vs isaac woolf respondent frol froin third district woods hoffman for appellant dickson varnan vannan for respondent spon dent W 0 margaret margue sanders ap appellant iva ivi v isaac woolf respondent from third district woods iloff hoffman man for appellant dickson varian varlan for respondent 2 27 win wm 11 11 bowers respondent vs the london bank of utah limited appellant f from rom third district sutherland for respondent baskin van vaa horn for appellant |