| Show j iN REPLIES W 10 BAILEYS SPEECH Denies Defeat of 1894 Was Caused by Doctrine Of Free Raw BINDS CANDIDATES In X I Tr lu H 11 pill loll to III n Subject I IT r T r sir 1 Sept sett 20 OA A he hei heru r doa do doIr l i f I Paso i tonight after ru Ir J a interview In III ropey reply pI to 10 toj top p j 1111 u I tax on nn raw new 18 ru that the Damo Denno Damom Mr car u leo lea leot leaI I m mute the V f l t 11 It ld l hv v the Iho doc doci n I VII Wll f i nu material In III the lite t I f II n 1 10 C ai not nol forgotten that H I 1 94 9 4 caused by b the ther Ihen d I I tt II 1 n r Democratic ranks over oer rf rem i 1 I Mention t h Ir Hr d if l IH rew r Halloo Hallcy II t ti hp i fI I nl campaign tI of or ISO P I I A I eel I In III Con Corn ConI hl I n a II platform which I y I i ri trine trim of o free treo raw new u IJ I II p a rm n tier her also alio al o I i that wo we w won wan that t tit t r MI h hOIl P of or 0 represent All t I i t veral raw mn ma mau u hi li 11 both holh he and I 1 iI t tn I r a to ro on In InI r I l I t I tor and Ind to tt ml in aa Ionel defeat tot to tn hr II g theory t r 1 I ii t i v iv II t of w t tI I I II ce TOP HA a WO WASH I CAPT ARCHIBALD W BUTT Military aid to 10 President Pr l nt Tuft Taft whom who lit In h 11 o ill III ac H on au till the comine ew hog through the states u h bound I affirm that an In official hll In I bound b by hy the pint platform form but Senator Bailey If It T J rood rod his ht aright Arl ht dons dam not un tin opinion on this th PREL h WOOL nor PLANK the tho free wool plank pro IU e l b h by him f and mpg by h Senator Halley Mr Ir Bryon d declares No one but hul a n wool 1101 grower will 8 tie r pt hl hi on till th au bJ H r n I n when it In Iti understood inn lint ill 11 then than The main nail rait i of r I devoted to t an n attempt to t war the argument that a II duty dUI or nn raw I IP always Iwan Iran to 10 the eo sunter H U He that h he must muni overcome nver that Argument or eon oon on ont t etu hid policy would put lint a higher tax tAl upon the the oon Olt sumer would have hava to 10 pay IY under Ruder our otic polity He HI la Ibo labors bom to prove that a II tax on raw rw material would not nOI be II rrt under hilt bin p polky polk lk but he Inder Inadvertently u It en one onti on entente that my position Ha ne gay aye If lr J the manufacturer the tax lax nn ii his hi raw material to 10 hl hi his con aumer then I will tell you vou how to 10 prevent ul him trot from Acing ao o 0 n It U ya All as simple as n 8 the Let It UN uti u lake It lIT flit the l product a UI as he cannot annot transfer hl hili hie tax lax to the raw rM material This IH is I more than thon ampie It l III ha My M I proportion proposition stands alanda land that thaI a tax mi on n raw material l Ts fa r to ta the product and paid by b the oon von at i I |
