Show OPINIONS OPI lO Men In With Cannot HP lIe Tried ne UH Atty tty N K J 1 harris n nt ot 0 1 to change n the tiled nied It K I h IL Ii y F i Quire J and Aud John Joun K ii charged with rob b ly the supreme court lIrt decided today In an all opinion written by b Chief Justice D U I N that a It new I W Information not b be filed and the men lIlen were ordered tl to the tl opinion Mr Ir Harris did ill not that the II wax was fatally do fe lIve until after the Ute defendants IHU 1111 entered a pled Idea of nt Then he aked Judge J A howell HOMo before l tN whom the tha ease oae WH we tried In the tie Second 8 district court to the Information and allow him to flu a all n mues w If time the tb we wee l the lime defendants attorney a asked that thee tha II b bo be made th thee rl ants The court II 1 the tike InCur and also II discharged d tIme the defend defendants ants Following the order to the Information a new complaint wan was l the t h three Diet AU Atty Harris then thell naked asked for a lunch bench to 10 be ha U d to bring tb the three men Into Int court murt to enter I their plea P Judge How ell refuted to Issue the warrant and nd i 1 roo for fr or a writ of or e was wu brought b before fore the supreme court After review reviewing Ing the U case e th the supreme court held that It II wa was w too tet hits to 10 amend an II information Iton or tile a new one after aft the time had pleaded to the charge chance them lu In an IU opinion written b by hut Jus Justic Ju tic tice D N the th court decided this th morning that the special pe JI lI lal electIon held leid In III Carbon county for or In Incurring a bonded In tn the sum um of or to tu he build a II county court courthouse courthouse house hou wa wis valid all and nd the th proceeding brought by lIy J U M to secure a It writ of ot prohibition them bm from negotiating the tho bond wo was d dl dl tu l turn rn It wa was WAIl 11 In the Ile application cation made malle b by Mr that the tho notice of or the tilt election was as Irregular and Insufficient because It ItOM OM mild not Dot d t the polling lOlling places The petitioner also ulso contended that the election wa was void old because th Ih the notice did not Dot specify the particular qua nullification which entitled the electors to vote yot The TU court held Mold that the statute latu prescribed the qualifications and that the tb notice n tl sea waa not to not notify If the tax tali payer what th the law I la was ada In Inthe Inthe th the cane cae U Jt was WAI also shea held thul that th Ih the statute do not nol require the tin lIt noti of or electIon to lo set 1 forth the polling plain Iliac A Mr Lr Whitmore wa we w also alo al ordered ordred h b the th court ourt to pay If Pu the tho vest cot tom foi bringing I th tilt application |