Show CURes Cases Buill Mont Feb court nt n Helena yesterday listened to 10 alluded on the application of or T 1 Augustus for tor a writ of or prohibition directed to District George M lI nt n Dutto to prevent him from proceeding In III hearing the of ot tho Iho Montana Vs VI and othern wherein It In III nought to recover damages for tor ores alleged to have been heen extracted from tho Went Wt Colusa Piccolo lode lodo claims cI lm nl for tho Iho con of the Iho statute under Judge Bourquin recently dismissed III the directed l the motion to out Judge hell held under thul If It failed to material questions or to 10 produce material tec and refused to his hili deposition hp 1 hl hili right lo to answer alli nen that the statute Is I not lIol On tho other hand counsel for tho plaintiff company nr that the law wan OA valid That Will wan tho only material l In tho pro Ira IraI I but Jul the question IH IA one of or va t Importance The ho court tool took tho matter under lIh lIn 1111 Sto I A Pollock k Co brokers re 11 report port lION the following Han l quo Nevada NORd 8 today 1 hJ J Asked pd 16 10 5 62 SO 3 16 18 Jim 63 I GS 10 Jumbo U 36 11 M M sr 12 3 10 11 ml 71 J 91 1182 18 10 41 4 01 10 as 11 i 18 30 10 1 on Vir 21 oo M CO COI I 20 O 10 42 12 14 Union m 11 M I I l O |