Show T Mm AD VERSE m f FACTORS r War Var Fire and Cotton Were Arnon Among The flie he Chief Ones This Week V COUNTRY STOOD SHOCK VELL WLL Collapse of Cotton Doom Boo I J While Fire fre Ios Loss stimulate Some Industries New ew York Feb a G Du Dun n Coos Cos Weekly of at trade tomor ton row ro w wi will HI Fay Sl sa War ar fire and cotlon were ho tho adverse factors 1 In the tho v we k yet the tho th country stood the hok rt well weli wel nail and there ther arc tro ro encouraging symptoms To 0 a n Ian largs A de me gree tine the outbreak of at in the h orient antI and the tho collapse of at the boom hurl hud been discounted roto and utah th tb jj dim ios loss of or tho the conflagration u offset very ery largely by the tire olset 1 i It Wi Rive give to many 7 structural steel In restoring Baltimore them will 11 I be great activity In the tho large stocks of or goods must be Ic re me f placed and orders tilled by b nul Jobbers tIl M manufacturers elsewhere are ars arriving In II this city It In large numbers number nUmb rs from tram nil all ni sections of or the country and there ther Is la a n good demand for tor or all gool ladIng a staple lines litres with notable urgency for tor prompt shipments The Tile labor labom situation throughout hout th country countr Is devoil Qt More Mora or less lesl congestion con stol results from Crom from tho tue weather anti and this fa aloe tor a counts for Cor or the tire small loss lo s of ot 17 li per pr c ent nt n In iii II railway earnings during January Actual business busl B Is S II re II hr n tho the Iron imiri and steel Industry tr but lut bu there thera Is more 1010 confidence In tire the future and th extensive of ot plants by the h leading producers suggests that fore en markets will ho bo entered wi more ames thrum than over ever before betor Hides rIte are less lesl firm f 11 lam I sales ri have occurred at the tire lors this week teel In the tho Inita States t are lre IG lust lint v ek k 3 the tho preceding week weck and JM r the thre o 0 responding week last a t year Failures ii I Canada number 23 35 against M lat t week 25 23 tIre the preceding week nad an Q o last year ear |