Show MIND MI UNSOUND WILL INVALID INV A ALO I IA ISo So Says Supreme Court With Ref Reference Reference Reference to Fredk Van CHARGE OF OP illS HIS IS It II I Vui al rust III ui II Condition 11 ai u tj br Ir Opium anil alt lelh of I i In the ca COMe cliMe e of the tlC matter maler of the estate of at Chance Von Alstin deceased et A C and Ott Van nn ap all ni vs a Charles 0 O 1 Van Vun un Alstine and amid Helen 15 M Van Matins by y Dora Doris S 8 Von Van their guardian ad uJ the supreme court today tOU handed down an opinion the he judgment nt of ot the lie lower lowr lol court time tho purport of ot which was wa that Frederick Ilk Van UI was not hot ot of sound und amud of or disposing mind ut itt tho thu tl tulle time he lie made Ills his hi will wi anti and hence the hue same catTle lamo Invalid On May Hay 16 It l Dr r A 1 c e C Ewing executor of nt the time will trill wil Hied IId tle sumac Kamu lalU fur for probate In Iii Inthe Inthe the lie Third district court IS 1 Charles U n l and Ind lichen Helen B ii V Vini children of ot flied filed ed a 1 protest t the hue lol of o the will trill 11 to t probate They fhe charged Hint thai their heir mithi er or addicted to the excessive lr usa u o oot of ot opium o lul und and Intoxicating drinks drink and ald at tit lt HIP lii time he ho marl made his wilt 11 he 11 did not miot lot have lints the tue mental menial capacity to 10 tomake tomake make n a will 11 or throat of ut his hI property TIme contest was heard beard before a I Jury In Judge Stewarts court which thich found that Von an wan ine U not miot It of at sound Round anti disposing mind humid when he ho hI executed his will wi w ili Van tan un left lee an estate valued at ut atmore t more than consisting of at cash In bank anti and mining Decedent bequeathed to his lila lister eister Isabello Isabelie Van Alstine the sum Of f t JOW 10 and amid the tie re remainder remainder to 10 his two children At the trial Dora S 8 Van the divorced wife of decedent mind Ind mother of ot the two IWO Children testified In their behalf An objection wa was waR railed to her being al allowed allowed allowed lowed to testify on the tIle ground that that she abe had a direct Interest In tn the event of the suit and was disqualified under unter sub subdivision subdivIsion division 3 eelon 31 l The Time supreme court holds that tt Van an Alstine has hua hlA not Mt a n direct In Int tet t Bt itt 1 the suit I and nd ni hence henl she sho Is II not l from The The opinion ion ton of at the lie court COUll the judg judgment o meat ment was wali a n by Chief Justice HI anti concurred In by liy justice JUlle Marten District Judge dissents from tram the lie opinion |