Show I 1 LOSES 1 ES Lower Court In III the Domestic Laundry Case The supreme court has hall till the judgment of ot the lower o r court In thu vase COle of r Christian and end 0 O 11 H Jensen Jennen Jen n vs VB w VT B S rt et al 01 appellants The Tho opinion of the court was Willi written by IJ Judge JUdg and concurred In itt W bt b Chief Justice J lIa and Justice Dartch Bartch The ThO action Was brought broucht In the Third district court to recover a certified check for tor OO 00 and to compel comp 1 the ran can collation of If a 11 note for tor ShOt both oth of which ele delivered to tu defendant by Plaintiffs 08 os the tho purchase price rlee of ot and Alma D O Katz Kuts inter interests ests esta In the tise Domestic The deal wan made on the port part of Mr McCornick nick on June Julie 25 lIPS and time tile check ch ck and note nOle turned over to him to be held until It n later meeting when Katz Interest could be transferred to tho he Jensen Jensens It H was wan guaranteed that the property was wal tree free from nil cli but It w WitS vas g discovered by plaintiffs that It was no so ort Oil June 27 21 they declared tIme the den decil oft and demanded the return of if the tM 1 cheek rh k and the note The demand was refund and suit brought to recover the same The low lower lo er lr court rendered Judgment In n favor of o plaIntiffs which Judgment lias hits now lOW been bl heel 1 affirmed by tha supreme u r me court |