| Show Till 1 The Springfield S Republican tells tell tho the tory story of ot a divorce ca ease nae e aa as an tIn of the complete anarchy that pre pro prevails voile vails in n this country In 11 such an I matter It Is III welt well w to be re ye reminded 11 minded once onel In a white while of Ut the fact that I thin thIs country c though professedly ex cx extremely extremely jealous of ot tho the sanctity of ot the tho home homo suffers suffer n a condition to tl exist which can hardly hurdly Jy be b paralleled lc In any civil zed teed country Tho The case Cane Is one which Is attracting some lom attention In New York A little littlemore littlemore littlemore more than a year ear ago one Mr Ir Pell leli of New York a 11 member of a n welt known family went scent to Florida secured a legal there ther and soon coon was suing In Inthe Inthe inthe the Florida courts tor for a 0 divorce tram front his hI wife wire on the ground of desertion The couple had separated some months month pro pre previously v by mutual agreement the tho hus hue husband bend band leaving the two children with the wife and agreeing to 10 pay JOY her a sum aum monthly month for tor her maintenance Mra Mrs Fell Pell Ignored the Florida proceedings al although although although though she was notified 1 and last lut Octo October October October ber Mr Pell Poll secured his hla divorce no op opposition position being set up Immediately he stopped topped the payments to Mrs Pelt Fell Within n a 1 short time tima he was married again In Connecticut and anI went abroad with the bride No sow ho Ibe i thit Mrs ra Pell Pelt has haa brought suit ault for rol divorce In the New Nt York courts naming the second Mr Mis 1111 as asa ft n H r action Is based basell on the tile theory that the Florida had Md no lawful effect upon her own on matrimonial status that Mr r Jels Connecticut marriage null and void td anti and that lint his present re relations reo reLatione lations with Mrs Fell Pell No Io 2 J afford Ground for an action for tor divorce for herself h t Jt In the courts court of New Mew Ne York Here lIere IIer three states are Involved Was Waa the dl di v ro granted In Florida Invalid in New ew York If Ito to so the status of or Mr dr Pell urn end his second wife h ii I radically radl allY different In the two t o states state Th The tact fact is f that tome some uniformity In Inthe th the dIvorce dlvore laws should b be brought about No o dliNn who has bal ha th the wet wel welfare f fart fare of ot th the country at hurt heart can with without without out an anxiety ty seen scan the proceedings of ot divorce c urU tot rot they reveal the tact fact that the up of at homes Is a be becoming coming altogether too frequent an nn oc us occurrence currence WIM latt ii 1 If it hon estly applied would do much good Dut But Dutno no Ito l A and statutes atul can entirely r rem m edt dy the evil nil age ap Is I tick sick for tor amusements and excitement And the three a ar re r sought ht In the tb club rooms moms nubile bubile resorts fe orts the theaters the densing halls belt not Mt to mention meation the gambling dens den and saloons The T home borne has be bt become b come com a secondary It consideration to toman many man In these theve th facts much mu h of the theM M complained of taa its source The rhe he remedy should be bt in the building up of ot the tilt hone home on oti the tilt bull basis Intended by the th Greater Until this thle U la done the dl di mills edits will keep on grinding to dust the Institution on which the state Is ii built |
