Show TUE ilE n ATER V CASES RIVER MYE 1 Illy JORDAN IVi T Li i 1 Vi J Supreme Court Affirms Decision liven by Judge Morse Mure in District E Dissenting Views View by Associate Justice Baskin L C rho The case C IW of ot Salt Lake City va a time the theP i rit P lt Lt Leke ke CItY CI Y Water tot and other misers ot of ottto tto tIn Miters cetera of ot the Jordan river has hlll hasI I 1 Irn rn fl decided by the tho Supreme Court Tho ded of o th the luv 1111 er court WAil Ya i It 1 d Justice Ju 11 d the tho t opinion of ot ourt oun which hitch ii was wal cOt con cOtI I I m in l I hy y I hid JUMI I ip Miner only I Justice Miss Minn t I IThe The u udon aton ion xi 1 ii II I lit to ct Ibi time the f r nii Ih various tAnal Anel to th th 1 i f the time watis waIe of tho the Jordan rl ri i n 1 I un UH tried Tull Morse Mone 0 I MI ti 1 ugo 1110 occupying tho the att it ii fur for about ahou t t tw u j decision lu Judge M Mi Md i s II unit that the ht h Suit Stilt Lk i u I Water A t VU 11 1 I I Ithe 1 low r k t 1 an ltd d tn ti D time the use uso of ot all the till theat I I tie of o the i at above Ilbo the th nt where theIr UI lr power plant I is i ito hi he said waters to i lie bc r to th Ih t ream tream for tor tim tho t us Lice III of ot thi th irrIgation com corn lanice limo Tho court n 0 held l that Limit the rity und nd Irrigation comi should al ii luW low a sufficient flow In in I this he hl river at all times homed to furnish time Vh v III tiro tru their of o the and thE appeal we WA M taken from this latter latterI I rt of the uni that p pert rt re reo ip to the right or of th the power corn oom cornI cm I that the time city appealed claiming that It would prevent time the storage of or waters vatere in to lieu take Lake The Ph decision of nr the Supreme Court Coutt the shove decision II a n very opinion covering about seven een seventeen seventeen teen t ln page I of o typewritten matter Justice In n his hll iii IlI dissenting opinion lou ion hold that thu the power company had no Ito right to tim the time waters by It In October und and November ISO 1593 b Ia be CHUM of ot the Ih prior appropriations mads by the city und end several other othol bore who have used u ell all 1111 of ot time the waters rs of ol the Jordan Jor nn river since ISIS 1811 The rhe rower power company at 11 time the Ih U It erected cr its power owr plant knew of ot these theM appropriations mind and nd knew tutu that the lulL haLt built a I dam damn to hold bock bek tim of If tub uh Ike lak for urn umee dur duro during tog ing h try Iry It Its ILl u Will mere rv not flUt good Rood He ne thinks It Itin in III ncr tram from th ti decro of or time the lower ower coUrt und from toni lime fact that Limit ft suit stilt U Is Isnow now pending wherein ln the Ule sold ICI tower lower company seeks to acquire by eminent domain th tIme tight right ti III t liMe uce the th Salt lAke Lako 1 canal anal for the water to Its plant Unit that It tm litt l 1 no right to Ui tIts till me URe of aM petit or ni 11 the thc Waters timers there therein tb in Justice further holds Il tIll its tI the city In is the th imly i tty that IN ig on em portion of or the Ibe de tie decree derree cree rree allows the Salt Halt Lake Illk City Water Vatar ant and nIl Electrical power ower company the right to divert the water ter should ho M be set t cello |