Show LOWER LONER COURT COURTIS I IS SUSTAINED nl to Respondent TO EAU BEAU COSTS v Action Acton Wn Wu to Quiet Title Tithe to Pro per If In iii 01 Outer her Court Justice of ot the time Supreme Court this morning handed down the decision of that court In time the case of at William Wilam Asper special administrator of ut the es cs estate tate talo of ot etA A H deceased respondent reSpondent dent vs M C Moon appellant rt ing the Judgment rendered In the lower court and an taxing the tie costs upon appel appellant lant The action was WIS brought to t quiet title tte to lots In addition to 10 Halt Bait Bai Lake City which M hi C Moon tho the appellant claimed adversely to tIme the plaintiff f set setting setting ting up a 1 tax lax deed Issued In tn 1805 5 as I Ills his title tile The Time only question queston Involved Is I tho timo validity of ot the Iho deed Justice In 11 his opinion quotes from tram a ta of ot the time court In n a 1 former case Involving the time sumac same sale question queston In the case ot of 01 Oh semi vs 10 Utah this court held that hint The title tte to 10 bo be acquired un en under under der Our the tho Statutes authorizing the sale of ot land for tor tho nonpayment of ot taxes is I regarded as IS strict Juris and an whoever sols sets up i 1 tax title tte must show that all ni the tle requirements ot of the time law have hlo been bean oel Complied compiled with Wih The the appellant to show that the property had been assessed In Inthe inthe the Iho names of or both bolh II I P I arid and WV W V H U Fol Folsom sam som Joint join owners oler and that their full ful names hid been cen Inserted In the tho delin delinquent quent tax list published and the failure to te the time property In said list listas listas as ni being In Salt Bolt Bol Liike City Cly vitiates the tho tax sales Rles ami bence bones destroys appellants claim of title Itle to the time land In tn controversy Time The opinion Is concurred In by Chief Justice Minet and Justice Kartell lime Case Jacob Champley charged with wih mOot adul adultery atul tory tery lor was a taken Inken before Diehl Diehi morning for Cor or preliminary hearing TIme Tho ho examination h is I being conducted by lY Assistant County Attorney IIO and the Is II represented by imy h Attorney Prank FranU Justin At 1230 today the time ex ox examination was not anti and nn It Waft tsa continued until tomorrow afternoon nt at 23 When court coull today tOlay Witnesses s for or time tho state were ivero being ox ex examined 1 I dutch from rul Porter Purler In the Ibo of Fanny Couch vs 1 Don Porter tried before a Jury In h Morses court yesterday a n verdict wan sra 1 given hel for tor the plaintiff Miss 1 Coush was lS employed nt At the time Ken Kenyon n as a a and anc site she alleged that Mr Per Por Perter ter er hall had wrongfully withheld hoe her or trunk torn front her item which she sued sue to recover Time The v la is II for tor th the recovery of or the trunk runk or SI 85 Its ls value together with SIO 1100 damages for tor time tho wrongful doten lon tion ton thereof Additional Venire Judge Morse MorRA has hM leaded IJ et an nn addition nl ni 11 of the time jurors Juror to 10 serve In tn lal civil division of or the district court The venire Is I returnable today tony anti and consists of time tho following names R H F P I Oeo Geo U 13 I Margetts ls F P D I Jr J L I C Sinclair H If P Lytle John CeO Gr Lucas I Ii D A M Froiseth J II If It Evans Eans and Gee 1 t 1 Emery White Vs 1 s White Myrtle Myrte White Is t suing her Item husband Athelbert White for tor a divorce In the district court The Thu cause CAlse for tor divorce Is in failure of ot defendant to provide tho the common COln oun necessaries of o life le for tor his imla hl wife wie and ant sun SUIT OISO of ot Johnson vs VI Finally Falls Fails Jal to lo tho limo Ground The caso case of at Emma mma E Johnson vs Andrew Androw was today to ay dismissed ed edIon upon Ion POti stipulation of at tho time attorneys attorneys In lit Int t Imp case 11 toy 1 Judge luigo Morse Mor o the The corn com COI 11 Us nied l by Richards and aM Ferry Felry for tor plaintiff prays for tor ZO d 10 damages for tor slander and defanta defamation Lion tion of ot character I Tho Time charges In the complaint sate ate that on or about the time and days of or March 1900 10 and at nt divers other times defendant did Utter uter and publish false and lind defamatory matter concern lne Ila ter Ing lg Mrs Johnson to the effect that he ho was tras WIS a n woman of ot unchaste charac character character character ter that Peter Peler Johnson her imer late lalo hut hUl band hand was not the tho father of at her child born bol between the date dato of ot their mar marriage and his tile death that her former husband John wets was ni not lot the tho father of ot her Imer first child and Ind that she sIte killed tier her late lato husband Peter Pele Johnson by poisoning him hilts Mrs Johnson Johnon alleges that all au ni tho tue statements enl were trams uttered wilfully and maliciously by ly Mr Shul sun sen and that they were trace false talie and an un true tru The ho defendant In his answer dented denied each ench and every allegation The Tha case caso OSO was dismissed at the time cost coat of ot plaintiff COURT COUNT COUI NOTI S Judge JUdg Stewart Is stilt engaged la lie 11 hearing time the Van will wi contest case The Tho case of at W H 11 I Cromer et al 01 a va w Martha T P Arthur was eva IK submitted to 10 the time jury jur In Judge Judg Morses court today The case CISI Is 19 nn on appeal from tram a Judgment for fn tri favor of or plaintiffs rendered In Inthe tIme the Justices court COUll of or Morris Hommer The was Willi brought by b plaintiffs lo to recover r coni from the defendant as IH com cam commission commIssIon mission for the sale Rille of ot real property In tho the case cuse of or Fred Gibson vs S Susan SUlan Susannah nah naim Barlow et el al Judge Hall hail today rendered t ft decree In favor of at plaintiff and ordered time the sale of ot the time property In controversy The T derisIon decision was I ren ron rendered dered upon the pleadings In the ease case and Ind orders the time proceeds of the sale of the property to be divided among th time the parties In Interest The property In Involved InVolved VoWed Is 1 a n part of lot 8 S block 21 plat D 13 and Is valued at about 1200 |