Show J LOIS SENATE AM EN 0 M Answers State Stale Depts communication SItED STATES NIL NEXT N SOW lOV E EI I 1 ull 1 III II Ii t ure arh I lone Joi ex cX n from th Ihl British govern corn com state r t th reciting i the thC action of ll th tr tret iy taiC nate upon UP the bt at noon non today loda Lord jl JI h I the tainted Secretary Hay hayI tj h raY 11 af ht that he bad 1111 received a aI an 0 Ii I from fron Ills hta 1 government I n And It had been In fl his ht on n L days Secretory n lor Ot general a 0 acquired g Iad ad charactEr of O tilO tho re rc o r t V r I to the tho state de tie dont Td appointment lie nt noon bY answer him Hay It l In Iii the tIlt t tt to 10 from Lord Lans Laau f fl minister of at foreIgn the l and una ot of ifA III 10 O he left n 0 copy with The und and the thet hay closeted for halt half nn an I were ere t of the confer At the Instruction It was that was VaS the to notify hI t t U r States that of the g did not see Its th Senate amend ur elm cIer to the amendments were werl treated In tie de rte III length tall at some lome of the British sov gov the that It had Imad show armen being bI to O t fT r to accept fOun aoun the tho of time the details Alter After dl them es with an of forced such a co course rao was government There the t WIn upa I of counter I nothing In the nature a 11 was nas aa 1 J i proposition nor ao was vu any ny opening eft I for or farther action by W the time lr British Ush goy gov goi government I there Is Isto Isto Isto if It was as S stated that I to I be a attempt to amend the tho treaty treat so as ns to au nu authorize the United States to construct a waterway across arross the Isthmus then it ItIs iti It Is i lor for the States to make m ko the overture The British government simply drops the th at point Secretary hay lUr carried the communication cation t tu the ike White House to talk with He the gUI e nt as to future action of ot the department d The Impression prevails that there e e will be no Immediate action looking JOO toward ard the negotiations of a n treaty treat The lie belief bellef teems ms to ip I be warranted that there Mill 1 I be na no rm further negotiations tenI Ion I on the Ibe subject c In n the Immediate tore tuure some come 10 event l n not now fore toro Ita leo t by the officials m f a n radical In the situation It r rot present the tl text i of t tho the Brit fib J er will be withheld e from pub ration n ll this sIne side III IteI Ite of or C the water at nt any rte rat although It Is I raid p l that at after the has thoroughly th considered tit matter some Bome general 1 statement s a t may w he moade as aa a to t the h ler point n developed The nt answer n Is long ong as such ft go 10 and would oUd make about t I to o columns COlu The tone of the reply re lf Is distinctly friendly tr tn through so o In I the concluding of ot good will I I and a desire to t cooperate In the th realization of or the un Although Alth the l text Is la with ww ed It U ii understood od that r the e answer it s SLIP u up p tk the a three amendments m made madeS lif I iL the thC Senate en an and p th the i ties in If the way lla ny of assenting accenting g to them S ameid a tD tn the a tto n which struck 8 ruck ou oil all that at clause of the Ih treaty eaty treat tr Inviting I Other her maritime mar nations nation to concur In Ini the e neutralizing Gt a anal the Brit Britt oh th tha el ts that I i sn el States nn Great real it Britain can bind b d themselves t IJ by y treaty to 0 the th canal nul they the cannot make ke kU t l thIs action i b lading n on nil all ether ger aments tI theo eO eOAs gov c Onsen I M As to the ot of the thene ne lit t the Senale a as provided by bu ments It Ita rears faca to toe te Ih e that a t such Is tep Eap each c h aid Ide ng t to 0 b be 0 ta taken ken kent of the c se Is n the presented Dals t op ai In the a to be he chief Ibelle ot an ogre ent and forth fortha tion il I I a fair al er S to Ioor Irence front rom Its general a 0 of tImi Could rould be theft be the on ent other po A m ence thAt w Ut UI Ine answer makes Plain bIle It I d tt not make counter It It t doe doel or r PIO further action ro down not a pr lude such action by bV h hered d to wit bout which will l l b ad na Un tIa On the the t devla dovia taku the the Answer ot of to t at the an argument tend tending In Lr t the SI al do proposed o not fairly consider the hit t f Involved and til r In tt reason renon fonn they cannot be bu nc no t presented There Thero is tC s tor U tr In the tone of at the late hi I l 11 negotiations hi s for tor r something and owing to the Teat great the be the they have constituted tOl the e nt fl be Je II a rt Thu treaty Mor to 10 the Congress Opening ot of the tel to re and Wa submit In December IS It t y In that FOme POt titer ater dela delay w finally I ts several 1 amendments had II was wa macic 1 on what as the I Davis amendment t terra term Il a did not gi the thet tIt In right to fortify the tho gen ral the tight language ge It ox ex rt thIs lUI ia b rasu country to t 5 He dr mr in regard to the Ir J nr 1 for tor th the of American nu Mitt After tIon Inn bats In two to executive COpte d ani Other the vero d treaty Ireat was r ratified I Th RI a t J ted tM t fia two amendments ut t ti th treaty hI h Invited NOI lon of at the to outer other foreign theIr As t h th umen reat con Conditions In had ovina Ihn not te It i wa th the treaty It I fl III i lit iti to present tor form tl to Its Un d that approval It In th minds moving con ld t I be vho ho of the the to a that answer a 1 not their Great Interests e In fla the anal 1 but ut all alle l l at larl all as ff and of the n t af of eol the th canal neue Ir treaty under uMer Ih the terms Me Ve the the of Usage II to Germany France I e and other nations that were rere enjoyed by Great Britain It was rather In III the character of or trustee for tor tho timi maritime nations that time the amended treaty trell was wag considered Important tion was US to the time effect of ot time the new nell Instrument I In completely wiping out the time treaty and the time righta which Great claimed un under under der tier that document Some of ot time thu lint Brit British ish statesmen held that there should be a quid pro quo If British claims under tho the treaty were wert It also held that Great Britain Imd certain vested v rights In Central America which hud had given Riven I ten place to time treaty so C that If It tho time treaty wait w ami to be lie succeeded liv 11 t something ieee substantial then tip tim old vested rights of ot a 01 threat rent 11 wen wem abrogated any mill adequate re rc return turn At 1 the tho same Mme time time the understanding here Is that the time sentiment dt British was 1 to avoid a II breach br or lasut hsu with the United States and It If possible to at range arrange a Or Common basis hn ls of agree ment meat In fomo pomo British It was held that too tot much friction already had haI been caused by hy the canal Issue and nad that since the tho United States Smales was will vIll willing lag ing to Invest tho hundreds of ot millions oC or dollars for the canals con coil anti and then them admit to It the e of oC Great GreH Britain and the world at nt large It was ns but Just to Rive give time the American government something particularly when Its political necessities ties required require 1 such authority In III this spirit and auth with these conflicting the time matter mutter has been pending before the British cabinet as liS a n result of the formal answer communicated by b Lord today The Time effect of tIme the British answer can cannot cannot cannot not be to restore reo tore the time life of the Hay treaty so BO far as us now ap up appears pears That document had a distinct limitation within which It could be h ratified and no doubt seemed to exist among that the time period expired when time the Senate Senat adjourned The answer Is IA chiefly Important therefore as ns making clear the attitude of the time British government alongside the tho attitude of tho time American government With time the two to positions I thull clearly clear do 1 lined fined It remains to tl be he seen whether time the United States government Will carry cairy carryon on further negotiations as no may recon cue clio differences and bring about a com corn common mon muon ground of ot action S NATOn TALKS New York March 12 Senator John JohnT T Morgan chairman of at the committee on Intel international national canals In an nil Interview with With tho Washington correspondent of oC the time Journal arid ami d Advertiser ways ays If It Is true truo as I hope It Is that our canal rights In Nicaragua anti and Con COB Costa Cona ta tn a Rica Wea acquired last December by b a u compact between the United States Staten and those republics will not become the subject of ot negotiations n on pa the Initia Initiation tion of ot we shall proceed quiet quietly ly I to construct own and use USI the canal and Great Britain will bo ho loft left to 10 make c cher her objections In such ouch form as she ahe may choose Those Tho e agreements were ere made deliberately anti with full tull knowledge that they the were In opposition to the thc treaty treat They were based baaed on the time principles of and adopted almost literally the regulations pre prescribed scribed for tor tho tim Suez canal by the treaty of Constantinople of ut 1888 1898 The Time President recognized the time right of Costa Rica and Nicaragua to quail qualify fy f their agreement with the United States according to time the plans and prin principles of ot the treaty trent of at Constantinople Great Groat Britain and anti the time United States mm agreed to me tIme same samp declarations in Inthe tho the treaty treal mid anti In con conformity therewith had hud agreed to silence mommy any un objection that might arise out of tho time treaty treat to the tile ex cx exclusive ownership ont and control of ot the time canal by Iy tho the United States Staten Great Grat Britain mild did not urge any aim objections but referred to them us ems be bs being Ing possible only and consented to remove them theta Her honorable course coursen nt n that time may nit nemt continue to ani mini animate mate her Imer conduct under the reign of King ICing lid I ward but hut she ehe must be aware that a covert threat of displeasure at atour atour atour our executing our agreements agreement with Nicaragua will lose lo e Its It II moral immoral force and Its power to alarm the time United States In Into Into Into to another fit of ot paralysis Those agreements upon which the time whole question of at the time canal now noll hinges will be carried out III In harmony and with the time undivided se of at the American people If It the conclusion n that Great Britain Is alleged to 10 have reached had hod been given Ien to the Senate ten days ago OJO the Hepburn bill would now be he the law of the time land All delay now noli Is to the ad advantage vantage of ot Great Britain and acid to our terrible disadvantage but she has gained another year eor on us I lt it will he be the lust last Wo We breach of the ponce pence e or of ot goud good feeling ill because we shall do tin under our i ments meats with Costa and Nicaragua what we have agreed to do ns us those thoRe agreements are In line lino with the treaty of or Constantinople le to which all Europe I I assets I |