OCR Text |
Show Unhappy with PSC order UP&L joins rehearing motion SALT LAKE CITY - Utah Power & Light, Co. last week filed a petition for rehearing before the Public Service Commission on the decision of the PSC concerning the sale of CP National arbitrary." Second, the options granted to the cities and towns are "outside the constitutional and statutory power of the Commission." Third, the action is unconstitutional. Taking of private property without due . process of law is in violation of the fifth and fourteenth amendments of the U.S. Constitution, it said. Finally, the order is an "unlawful infringement upon management prerogatives. The Commission has no power to unreasonably interfere with the normal day-to-day business operations of a public utility within its jurisdiciton," said the petition. properties to the Utah-based company. Apparently almost no one involved in the hotly-contested hearings is happy with the outcome. The Southwest Power Agency last week filed a similar petition, claiming that the sale should not have been approved. The petition filed June 16 was based on UP&L's feelings that the PSC's order was unlawful and "outside the scope of its authority." The decision by the regulatory body allowed the sale from CPN to UP&L. even though the Agency had contested it as not being what the people of southern Utah wanted. However, it also ordered UP&L to give options to the individual towns and cities within the CPN service district which would allow them to purchase their own distribution systems from the company. This would leave UP&L with the transmission system and the less cost-effective small towns and unincorporated unin-corporated areas. The Agency filed for rehearing because it wants the transmission system, which it contends is the most valuable part of pie entire package. On the other hand, the petition filed by UP & L said that the order went too far in the other' direction by allowing the cities and towns to purchase the distribution systems. The petition states four reasons for UP&L's objections. First, said the petition, the findings are not based on competent vkleaoe and are "unlawful, capricious and |