| OCR Text |
Show Assessor explains redevelopment views amount will be closer to $50,000, he said. "I guess a word of caution don't spend too much until you know how much you have," he concluded. Grimshaw also again told the group that he felt it should pay for the extra work (labor only) his office had to do because of the redevelopment and taxing procedures related to it. "That might go as high as $5,000," he said. Iron County Assessor G. Steven Grimshaw met with the Cedar City Redevelopment Committee Monday morning in an effort to explain where his office stood on the plans of the committee. Grimshaw said that he has concerns, p but also noted that he is a public ser vant, and "I'll work for you. I'll help and assist in any way I can." ; He further pointed out that his office has already cooperated whole-1 whole-1 heartedly and had completed much i extra work for the redevelopment i plans. He also noted that figures as to how much money the redevelopment group I would have this year because of i property value increases and raises in property taxes were still uncertain. J House Bill 164, which would have lowered taxes 20 percent after being raised approximately 29 percent in Iron County by an order from the Utah State Tax Commision, is being challenged in court. Grimshaw noted that if taxes had remained about the same as last year, the money available to the group would have been about $9,000. If taxes would be allowed to go up the entire 29 percent, there will be approximately ap-proximately $158,000. If H.B. 164 should be found constitutional and binding, the |
