| Show FLOOD IN DIVORCE COURT Mary French Who Wanted Ali Alimony many mony Sheds Tears Before 1 Judge Morse TWO OTHER DECREES ISSUE Indue IIII t IIII Woo Two II id Ill Couples During in I lit D t sho Aho would not come COllie to and aud with her hH husband among u Il lot of or Mormon farmers Mrs 11 Mary F l w y French of Denver yesterday down on the witness and anI shed copious l dm flu Clio ot of tears leals Mrs Is French Is 1 1 her ht 1 hus husband band Frank D French rench for divorce and yesterday tho th matter came up III on the hearing of ot her petition l to have de defendant pay pit hOI her per lei month ali alimony mony mon and attorneys s fees fee pending tho result of the action lelion French I 11 the tho manager of the tho Big Four Advertising company compan of ot this city and his wife 1 suing him for tor divorce on the grounds of ot Infidelity und and nonsupport When hen the husband came callie Into Judge Morses Mor les courtroom Mrs French burst into tears lears und and soon the tho husband hu was cry el elIng ing too She Sho refused to como to Salt Lake to 10 live with him at till the ot Mr II Frenchs attorney OETS J S FIFTY PIm PER MONTH She cold required pop pCr month for her WI support although she he could not enumerate th articles she should re Ie She said ald her husband had hul sent her 2 February She said slip Imd been living with her brother at Colo and is now 1101 stopping at nt the Ihl Knutsford with bur hr sister Judge c Morse at n t tho conclusion of ot the hear hearing ing Inlo ordered French to 10 pay ll his hi wife iO 0 attorneys fees and 50 per month dur during ing till of ot her action The 11 I ulal weekly divorce mill win Il ground hi III Judge Armstrongs court W WE E I was given hon u IL divorce from K on the grounds l of or distortion alleged ell to have taken Inken place at lit Port Portland land Or a n year mIJ ago 1110 Tho vore mar married ried In this city Del Dec H 1899 WIFE l Clark Clo charged I d William Clark with cruelty and witnesses cor corroborating this testimony she was WILli given 1 en n a The rIll couple wen WI rH married In III this city In April William J Watson appeared to show cause a use why wh he should not pay IIII to his hi wife Mary Corser Watson nillon temporary alimony and attorneys fees reIS pending tho outcome of tho divorce proceedings between them Watson lItson In I the man who according to his complaint drove her from h home without any all cloth clothIng clothIng Ing save what she sh had on at the time and refused to give up III her wearing ap ILP apparel parel 1 Judge e Armstrong Ar ordered that ho return her clothing and l I her IWI 2 I x r I month alimony and 50 attorneys fees pending till the adjudication of ot case |
