Show Rancher F Files es Third Plea On Taylor Grazing Grazing- Rule Rille Ru For the thi third time In three ears ear Jos Joseph ph F Livingston made an l ap-l ap- ap I- I inter inter- neal oeal to the secretary of ot the or Monday from front the ruling of aU a aU U S S examiner who ho denied his ap- ap pUca Uon to graze head of o sheep and 20 horses on the public dIstrict 6 R un- un under lir rl of f Colorado der dec the Taylor grazing a act t I I Through his attorneys Raymond T and arid Clair M Senior Salt Lake City Mr Livingston and his part Part- l Partner partner art art- nero ner Glade Cook attacked in their S lea of error or the priority on which their application I a cas refused At the time the appeal was as be- be be filed flIed with J H II Leech V U 1 3 examiner stockmen in a state ad- ad advisor viso board meeting were debat debat- debating debating ing lag the comparative merits of the th priority and location rul s rul-s s for lint lint- lUng grazing permits I In the list of 24 specifications S M of error to the ruling of Mover Moser Mo er e examiner amner v who ho ruled on the I case September 22 after hearing in Salt Lake LaIe held In July the appeal ap- ap appeal ap appeal peal attacks the administration of othe the Taylor grazing act on grounds that rules tules create select pre pre- pre preference ference and select special prefer prefer- preference pre pre-I enc ence clas classes clashes within a R preference class established in the original act The Tire rules attacked grant prefer prefer- preference preference preference ence to stockmen whose hose base prop prop- properties properties properties v were ere dependent or on the pub pub- public public lic lie range in question for one or ortO orto to t consecutive sears ears in the per per- per it'd Immediately prior to June 23 1934 1931 The act grants preference to all owners of dependent tad ind com coin commensurate commensurate tOI property In a statement Issued at the time I of filing the appeal Mr LiVing LiVingston ston I I ston recited the results of liri his first two appeals to the secretary or of he buth of ot which he won The first appeal made after Mr orI I Livingston ton was refused a permit in 19 5 was vas followed follo by a second refusal In 1936 on the Sis b of local custom obtaining In district 6 13 but the sec secretary ruled no e evi eri evidence 1 dence clence of local custom con con- con conceivably ably cel might support the rule may be found the record t 1 I Ii i |