Show hog pro program tam rules listed on producer and feeder reduction pay LOGAN it was as found difficult to devise practical methods of divi reduction payments be between teen producer and feeder the corn hog plan of the apicultural ogi agI cultural adjustment administration has been made to apply only to the orginia producer ot of hogs with to the actual number of litters far to rowed wed and hogs ggs marketed maik eted from those litters it was stated by director william Willi gm peterson Pc terson manager ot of the AAA for utah in replying to numerous queries from feeders feeders are expect expected ec to bent benefit fit materially teri ally however from any increase in market prices tat may result from rom the e pr program during the of tills this program the corn hog re elved melved scores of suggestions for including the man mah who buys pigs and fattens them tor for market but bul we ve did not net find any of these loons practicable said dr black chief of af the corn hog section in ft a recent communication to director ilow how to keep wick trick of the individual hog from tai fai rowing until sale was the big biff problem earmarking cr r tattooing hop hogs is practiced to tome some extent in some small kurop ean can countries but this system Is next to impossible in this country niete NI w bere rere ete more thun than ZO 50 million hogs eteh eich meaer baer all suggestions that sou fe feasible sible at all were vere gone into thor wehl hi hut but we ve were mere unable to find my wo kabe kabie plan by which we e 0 ill t eriv nr the ovner sh p and wf w n i f hr of from farror until 1 fr w e i c pter tvr therefore there no way av to be sure that dup t ili H n R P I 1 i rents rf its on en tre tie r 3 arnld not be made ex c t t fc ir are field force to cheok check li divi dibi it al p performance it was fn an I 1 d cidad that mat to gain ohp ob ili tl 0 e on SI roul OLI 1 b in furrowed atz rowed end and arar eted from tw litters on oa te farm I 1 afir co amal ln in cr coro eting itin hla hil 33 31 littias rs uis U ie anro m ter air in cl ve ur th total n anber 0 os utka itt ta ei entirely r V ly y j rim lin when 1 det dee j inac 1 IMI 1034 fua d 30 j 3 aloie Ll oie n kiy ditre nitre furrowed farrowed far rowed roved on the farm to be b cover ed by the contract ar not then to compute his average number of lit I 1 tor for this hog base he will di il im the total number of 1932 ond n nd 1933 litters by two if the producer pio ducer did noli nab stall stait farming until 1933 he may count the litters owned by him when hen far rowed ili 1933 1913 and the hops hop prodie ed front from those thee litkei lit tei as hi bi base bage without dividing by two provided lie had no interest inte iest in hog tion or corn growing before dee dec ember 1 1932 ono anc provided he had bad no ownership interest in a form farm i before july 1 1932 farmers who sold sows bows during ithe the emergency hog marketing pro yaw august 23 to september i will be permitted to add fout four but no utters litters to their fall fu fal I 1 lov OAI iners of 1933 for each sow sold in III this manner if they are to be allowed these additions however hoa ever chev must present bertan required evidence such as sales slips to the county allotment committee to show I 1 abst the bonuses for piggy sos I 1 were received it if the producer raised hogs only under tinder the stock share agreement 1932 and 1933 his base would be the annual average av of the numbers number of litters representing his share of the litters farrowed far rowed by hogs under the stock sare agreement if the contorting ting producer Is s to operate a farm in 1934 under a tok stock share agreement agie ement with a landlord who ra ased hogs as a producer in 1932 ol oi 1933 the total average of litters to be included ln in the will include the lane lords uernie litter base for 1932 and 1933 along with the tenant pio pid ducer i 1 litter base prodded the landlords eie farrowed furrowed far rowed by the landloyd land loid d |