Show FIRST PUBLIC AIRING OF GOULD DIVORCE CASE New cw York June Julie 0 Tho enema case of U Mrs 11 t re Howard I rd Gould G o mm I ii n lio hi Instituted inn III tJ I nn I nob cult UIL for tar a 1 from 1011 her hll hue hus hu band 1 Inn nil Howard I tin rd Could G a nil I was rin H given gi vein Its I tn Hist I t public I t a In ing In III I ii co ml rL today 1011 Tho ho wan WIl tine the mm F of Ut arguments it rg mm Is DI 01 of o in 1 for Mr 1111 annul tn to out Omit certain allegation in lit MIH MH nI I aim l eon pint I in t A nih fl I an ana of a t con nJ qi ide length Ii wen WI r mu ad and anda a nl a II their a c uI loii n thi th I hi a I H e me ghen ginn until Monday I io IJ nie Ill in ha III till Tin Tim un Oil which Ir aIr ormial is 16 u suing her Iner husband hu at as atm shown by I parts or of the complaint read by lIy el for ti Mrs II UM ar mont ot at o Alts Gould by her bier hc hll second he lie that the time conduct of oC Air Ita i r Gould are I lIeh that It was Iva 38 improper for Irr JI his nl wife n to live hc I with vl III Ii I him I n third In that brat 1 since anin ce Sep Hell on last ho Inc has halt lna neglected his liI hi wife and to 11 for Cor her hl ex no except that lull he ho paid loud for her liem support at tiny any flu hotel In oLd alne e that thaI lime i e in mu fourth fo ii ml In that Gould tints has treated rented his him hi wire with employed to 10 ha inn harass rass her canned call d her mull mall bag hll to bo Inc tampered 18 Pt JV led with a I I Ii maintained iii a I nta tIn eni Illicit I ii ic re with women of hall Imd character nail employed e an ann arid and sov iV cant otal om New Cl York orle detective to Hl improper evidence against Airs Irs Gould Nicoll said that thaI every overy at al legation against t Mr Ir Gould wilt will he de tie denied nied 1111 when Ihen the tilt answer lo to the suit sull Is tiled He tie maintained that thai the thc emerges to t 0 which he objected as us scandalous II the I a us and amid Irrelevant did not inot tend to In sup snip support sn port pert the tine allegation of or cruelty lie He es especially objected to tine the charge that for or nr three years Gould hUll hints maintained 1 Illicit relations with women of or bad character mind hat had conducted ted himself ll 11 L tints this respect In Inn an n open notorious manner He declared thai that tine Die th charges vore verc ere made for or the purpose ot of putting the ho I defendant c t in lii an nun olin ha og po position and annd that thaI In lii other cases such allegations have Inao hn been Introduced tho th court has iia stricken theta them out jut Tine The allegations are or decidedly sweeping said lie he The fhe plaintiff does doe not m mute tko any mention ally any cases caso or 0 even een evenI tell I Cl I exactly what at misconduct in I met the tin e de defendant ii e IM Is I charged char clI with There Thet Is III ab uh no nil reason for si s1 cli ch charges In Inn the tho I complaint I mit for far separation so pa ran I ann on HI tho ho ground of cruelty In replying to Mr arn argument anoint ment Sheath counsel for fo Mrs Gould said thai th If time the defense would URI mask for Ol a 1 bill hi I I n Ii I I pai pan i mm ta charges chales would be inc manic of so o nermine Ilour a ii character he Inc would not presume to lO I ii mention inn oil thon them t in In III I in court cout III In Inthe the th course of hH hIS hl argument nl We 0 have tried to tn Ii make mae this Ida lIll ease as little scandalous as all a possible saul alil Mr Ir Shearn and 1 do tin not want vaunt to tomake make ko the isa complaint conn rIde In t o ni i mote III nm 01 t pe pc l e ellk In Inn open niacin court COUI lint IC the allege allega allegation n tion that the defendant for or three yean yea ra maintained am Illicit Ill I el t and a nil I an relations with women of or had bad character and conducted rl himself notoriously ly and openly In inn tills thIs Is general ell IIII we v 1 will make malIc It more specific 11 I t Is Inn true trite that wo Wi do not sav a l thin tho th defendants actions were vere rc adulterous or 01 wor vor e but vo 0 will bo bin b to tn sub melt n a full bill of or particulars If It it IH tan asked u fol foi follit Mr lit I I Rh IlIn IJ ted Ild that thai If Ir tie the court should strike out Jul these allegation from flom rein the lie it would do in tine the plan I ii II It an at I I Irreparable ii re e injury Injun I mini t by li h not lint allowing her hor to 10 prove them therm the time come connes On tine tho other If Jf they hey Ih t were vr ru permitted penal II ed lo to in rin ni in tin th defendant still suIt would Jima vi thin the remedy left len tit at II the lie of or the thic trial |