| Show AT 1 THIS As tin th opening of or The Hague ton eon Kiesa draws near lo It becomes that peace friends will bo ho disappoint disappointed ed It they too much from Its deliberations Tho rho delegates opposed to nn discussion Ion of or tho limitation of or as IS arp the of Germany and Aus Austria tria They rh regret It Is 1 1 said suhl the International difficulties raised mIMe by h an In Insistence on n discussion 1 tn tl which of ot the loading continental ire Iro unqualifiedly opposed The attitude of the tho Russian HUllan dele delegates gates fates is all RII the remarkable be because b cause calise tho Iho first congress was WIS called by h thu Iho Czar for the express of IlIs i ift a It proposition looking toward the th limitation of armaments Iho government has hns apparently abandoned that policy perhaps with a I hv to future retaliation When a nation has suffered l In Inan an In war It la Is not In III n a humor for France would not ho 0 taken part In Much discussion anes tho humiliating treaty ot or peace with Germany at Versailles Arming and arming lo 10 tho tenth Will was tho French err cry then and that seems seem to 10 be h tha tho Russian aim a now Tho fh nU BIn delegates aro uro to have hlo tho machinery and anel the copo of or The rile Hague tribunal t perfected and Questions que ot ut maritime war and the tho rights and allt obligations of o neu aro as lIS proper of discussion tho of ot con contraband Is 18 considered especially Im Important The difficulty cJ It ot nf adjusting the lilt English and continental views on conditional contraband such us coal col machinery horses etc Is realized but It IK III hoped the dispatches stay that thu can elaborate n 1 what whal articles shall bo 10 considered contraband and under what conditions providing International for rOI court procedure perhaps even en an in ini national i prize e coutt of ot highest I In minco From I all of ro which it clear tho nU laii regard tho iiii an u a kind of 01 machine for tor the of or warfare rather than a II substitute pl or that mode of ot of or III Tho rho O doctrine It Is II stated tuc to 10 nt tho coming That IH II a 1 of I to 10 the A brief statement ot of that doctrine which linn lO aw an liS the tho doc doctrine doctrine trine may therefore bo be of ot Interest ut this till time aho n Argentina who hU hili country In Germany and France advanced the theory theor that no country hall ban the right in um US force for tor forthe the collection of ot debt The recovery of ot debts and the pursuit ot It private does not justify he said alii tha 1111 Intervention of ot ntH since l states Invariably follow this Ihla rule rulo In III tho reciprocal thoro thero Is I no nuon wh they should not It upon themselves In 1111 with lIh nations lit if the th II Drain another jurist of or the republic Will was minister of nt affairs In 1804 when wIll ot or thu powers attempted to collect pil vate ull claims from th lit of or Then he sent nt a II note nolo to III the Argentine minister at aL Washington thin not lint WUN UH subi sent HilL to 10 nil all the Ih American republic and Uuro I pi Iti III tills till hI main maintains that Ihal no linn hu tile the to forre folo to collect debts resulting from contract concessions loan III lc c the Willi louns money to tn a Ii novel nl into account the oJ lt tho Iho security und th ability tu III pay pa o ou hul u heavy ii fur tor th rink lie he und ha hajj no to complain U ft he 10 U dos do not 1101 say 1 Hint u It 1111 Hus tho right lo 10 Its III atm JI but that lulL It II h lu Um 1111 lo 1 choose choo thiS thu manner ami lUll th tinn of ut p 11 iv y silica lu national credit hr hon honor or ar alII id 1 Tills form of ur Ilu III doc aoe Ims hll the Ihl Drago 1 doc U If are Ir lill ran hi h III I p till i of ot J o II JIM Ih obligation of ot nations belong to that olaM lIa Buch cnn b adjudicated d by an n Impartial tribunal If It nil can ell Force Is therefore unnecessary 8 ry and on that ground Iho doctrine might bo UM nR International law not to tobe be he sot lilt Il unless oI It la III evident that a II In lit unwilling to 10 keep lt It ob oll able Ible to lu do so olio |
