Show DISTRICT COURT all criminal civil and I 1 probate matters disposed of for december terni term the december term of the district court adjourned last tuesday 1 the calander having been cleared the next term the first for 1908 will begin the first of maich the case of the state of utah vs john 11 arnold was dismissed arnold was charged vuth mith selling mort morta aged gred prop property orty the suit of the spalding manufacturing company vs james jaines macknight was waa also dismissed and the coats wele assessed against the plaintiff tiff tho the manufacturing concern had brought suit to collect on a note ruth davis vs charles wallace oc aupied considerable time of the court mrs davis brought a suit in replevin in the justice court ch charging urging that a hoise harness and a wagon jack which wallace had won from her husband gambling was her property and in the justice court she won out wallace took an appeal to the higher court the evidence did not show to the satisfaction of the court that fill all property belonged to mrs davis the decision deci Bion rendered gave her tho the wagon and wallace the horse harness and wag wagon on jack who was ordered to pay the costs in lower court mrs davis was ordered to pay the costs in the district court alma lish vs william sheriff shera A vaa N as finally disposed of after having hung fire for a long time john arnold owed 0 ed the co op store a bill and that firm seized two horses forsea on his place lish alleged that the horses belonged belong cd to him and brought suit to recover A former decision deci ion of the court gave lish one of the horses as the evidence tended to show that only one of them belonged to him ile he made a motion for a new trial which was granted and was set for hearing at this thia term of the c court urt but the plaintiff failed to put in his appearance and the case went by default E 10 horn vs S B rush went over until tho the next term the litigation between these two men arose over a ga dispute 3 as aa to certain water rights george R smith vs mrs driggs and frank hadlock was interesting and was the result of a misunderstanding as to the ownership of a piano which hadlock agent of a salt lake house had for sale smith negotiated for the instrument and took it on trial in the meantime hadik claimed that smith had rt r f w 11 I 1 part of the cont 13 fio savas I 1 Sg vas as uway away a gd lot y drigge in yr smith paid the balance of the money to the house and took a receipt providing that the piano had not been sold upon his return to vernal he brought suit to recover and luat lost ile he took an appeal to the district court the evidence showed that the note signed by mis driggs was dated on sunday and andt T W odonnell attorney for smith claimed that the sale was illegal and that therefore the receipt given smith at salt lake was no longer provisional the court ourt took the matter under advisement and will hand dov dom n his opinion at a later date alberta sorensen was waa given a divorce from nephi sorensen she was waa given the custody of the children sorensen had filed an answer to her complaint but he failed to show up at the trial here is 13 another case or of more than ordinary interest and it has been on I 1 the docket for a long time snellen johnson alleged that ira burton was in the unlawful lawful possession of one of his hia ponies and brought suit to recover burton alleged that the pony he had was his another pony somewhat similar to the one that burton had was found dead on the mountain about this time the court took all this into consideration and decided that burton must pay johnson 10 the price of the pony and that each nian man must pay his own witnesses |