| Show MARTI MAETIN J OASE CASE on the 11 alth th of november ber A D 1892 the J nation mation published a libel on martin far woolf mr fr woolf called on tile nation and asked it to correct tile the matter and publish publish the truth for just once the Ile republican publican refused mr woolf then took to th alie ration a office a Ile republican publican who was rt cognizant zant of all the matters at is sue eue andthil and this republican fully corroborated ro borated all that mattin maitin woolf had said arid and bealco ho also denounced the particle article in question as a tn malicious cious lie from beginning t to end in spite of this non nonpartisan partisan evidence of its falsity the republican organ still retired to do a simple act of ju justice tice to a man mail whom it had injured arid and abused then mr woolf went to the judges of elections whom it was charged lie he had intimidated and secured the writ la vf 0 t ten tell statements of five out of the i I 1 six who were present at the time of the alleged bul bulldozing dozing 11 these five men and the constable regardless of party or politics testified to the falsity fil sity of every charge made in tile the I 1 republican lepuil lican or organ an concerning mr fr this evidence Ws was taken to tile the semiweekly semi fcc weekly Y libeler and publication was demanded as an n act or of justice nor will any honest hoik st man deny that the party libel J 1 has a perfect right 0 to demand that he be EW bet aright when all the evidence tends to 0 show that lie he has 0 cn wron wronged 0 ed and yet with alth ill all the evidence in favor of mr oolf and not ont one line against him tile the republican organ refused to publish it as a matter of right as a mailer of justice but only bee beci it thou thought glit it had to puny paper it only docs does right M when it can t get out of it this is how it introduces the written statements of those seven nien men the following letter MS ie publish at the i or ra rather t tier demand of mr woolf we e comply firstly because Lo calise lie he threatened to knock the top of our 1 head bead off and secondly because it is is i lilting fitting that liis his on land hand should make known to the public just what goit of man he be is what must be thought of a paper ora or a man who only does his anty to ili his fillow fellow man to his brother because of fear for ME bis precious head iiii Is it wasn gasn t right to tOi publish that evid evidences eviden enc cs no threat nor promise nor any tiling thing else should have induced the republican organ to have published it and if it was ri right ht then it should have been published simply because it was ri right lit and not because of any imaginary dan danger daner er the nation attempts to justify its infamous course by bv the following in 0 on oil the same doy that bo be brought tile manuscript to the nation i afi ol 01 oance rice the warrant arrant Nv for liis his arrest ir rest chich atas aa drach on oil clec clention tion day was placed in the hands of an officer arid and lie was arrested and brought before tile colin and placed under liuo 10 bonds to appe ipp car dr at 1050 A AM al on wednesday vet next to answer to tin charge of voters volera on election day that warrant was evidently sworn out 0 help the republican organ out of f a hole what came of it it was served on oil mr woolf ile he appealed in court at the appointed time lie ile waited till the hour had passed then lie he demanded to seo his accuser dut I 1 ut no complainant showed up tip why not the court did not understand it mr woolf was indignant L A search was vas fiade biado for ti alic le accuser and he could not be found tile the republican organ says further farther for its justification the norn complaint of an injured party parly is is ample a alc plc L around for alio criticism in the A odo abis T ais paper lias has done dona a public u i in bringing the matter to the attention of the lie court bow ow let tholan deal u billi aih the case the public will find a full report ol of the proceedings in abi i pi paper iier the above is come somewhat what contradictory dictor dic tory T tile first Fen tance declares that the case in court was that organ a ground for making tho the charge against mr woolf wool f the next san tance says that tile the nations charge brou brought ht the matter to tile the attention of t the decourt he court the flu question estion naturally arnises did the court furnish the cae to the notion nation or did that organ take the matter to the court in either cither ca cae e let the republican or organ oran 1 an either give some proof that its charges are correct or else come out an apologize to mr woolf for tho the first allick all ati ick tek upon liis his character while it il rats eats its words for the second linn |
