Show DAIRY FACTS LOW PRODUCERS R LIABILITY LI TY Cows Vs Carried at Actual Loss Should Be Sold T yearly early records curds from florn 2320 cows O In lu till the six herd Improvement as al soda t tius In North John Jolin A A. A Arc Arey hi Iry l extension specialist ut ul flip North State colle college e. e finds hills a II of to In profits L between high yielding and anti low yielding cows Those hose producing an tai average average aver u age of IOu K Ml or more pounds of butter tot flit II a i your jour P gave five ve an nn increased increase ed profit of It r JUS U o er er another her group which pro pro- It less s than rhan lid mu pounds of fat a jear yeu says S 'S Air Mr h A Arey Il The a average of each cow ow In III the high prod producing group was pounds of mil milk k and pounds of fut fat In this group were welt H J VOWS cow In 1 18 lS her herds s. s Tim Thu enl u a f of each cow In the tow low producing pro group was iWi pounds of milkan milk un nn Wr pounds S of fat fut In this tills group were 8 7 cows caws from 31 n hel herds heids s OJ Ih The U average feed feel cost of the high millers els el's was HS J a year jear car and of the thelow thelow low was a year foie SUs Air Mr Ir Arey It If cost more mOle to feed l lie Ilie high digit tro producing cows for forone forone forone one sear vear but In return an additional worth of milk was secure secured Sir Mr Arey su says s 's he considered the tile fee feed casts cos's S s only In making these cal He He is convinced had he Inquired Inquired In In- too loo closely Into all costs such a. a as the expenses of delivering milk and other Items the cows In tIle the low producing pro dicing clueing group would not have returned any profit whatever Some of them were carried at an actual loss and anel should he be sold for beef If their production pro pro- production coul could not be In Increased b by better bet ter feeding and care I |