| Show I HARTJE HARm DIVORCE CASE CASEl l 1 ll ci Hull Wih Whit ull I loul tit 19 li Jut Jul 17 Ii 1 The TI wi wide n gum Iun lb tw h cf f the H He n ll I IN N f U a we A i the h nt of t ii re remark RUit when mark tx I 1 JiMB hr la in trl t trial wP a l lo The n ii f un l I the same ha 11 J u te eat that he h lid not nt wish Wl is I 1 Mi Ii hI ss 1 n ii lh t at l there tir I t t ai A Abe be been n Im I nI out nut ul of 41 o wail e Oil The Tb if ff if I the w J Judg relieved the M theof t 01 of the t test 1 hr Ir 5 n font anal M Is ered tr iund that h hell 1 l a ret r been ka n teat aul sail 1 Iun Jam I Puff u sn anal n t J hi me H Orr On O i ui ih lh 4 wIth l liU tOU I U Mid that Ut Mrs Mis Mr C T I 1 Ih 1 act at I 1 the Wrt ef flue t 1 v M as ala a J 1 JU U T r celT 1 Tb p lal had bad l a rUn r set u a r Wt it lo the 11 la In 1 r that IN INI he AM M It I was 13 l sat et IU t R k w M a fre tr Cr |