Show A DECISION The decision by hy tho the Supreme court or of the tho United States delivered on Mon lon Monday day In III tho the lla case cn c Is 18 one of at very Cry ery Krent g tat Importance a In tho the Deseret Jc eret Newt News It establishes tho the principle that In n a 1 case caile of oC divorce It Is IK t nary iary flar to tn the validity of oC u a I decree cre that both loth to the thu suit shall be he rest resi residents dents of oC the wherein It Is ron ren rendered dered Thin opinion of tho the highest court In tn the tile mini land lan 1 ought to l he ha o made In every ever part parI of ot tho the country There have been numerous divorces n either cither the man mun or the woman was vas H tl resident of the tile State lm I Jurisdiction According to the tho latent decree divorces WHO were Illegal ant the tho ho marriages that Ten ver subsequently contracted hiring during the lifetime of ut either elthor pf pt r the tho were Invalid and tilt of ot Kuch unions rime Tho consequences con of ot such Much L n decision will create consternation C an anI I tIring hung gloat sorrow and t j The results were clearly perceived por jy y the court anti and particularly by Ly the Uw Judges who from the time opinion of t the justices with the time majority of the hit court Three of united In resenting a 1 conflicting opinion and one more a U Independent I opinion evar 11 0 r In th the main maim with the tho other ilie Justice It will vIiI be seen een that the court of ot last resort obtained a n nit m mi of oC only one In rendering Itt do tie I irce tee ree This Thill tho the view not flat expressed that even cen the th molt mo t judicial hotly body bod In time the th lani laniIs Is IR not flOt If rt one on more morl jiul u hail Joined tho the minority the opinion F euld have been reven d dOf Of Ot course the decision will stand end and n nd Ilio will Ill have hav to be he no ho how many In And familIes are nto injuriously thereby It time the I arguments that have hae been e I 1 for fot a 11 uniform law on anti and It adds adlIN nothing however howeler to the pl pic n a 1 for national legislation covering these The Time same eanie could bo ho Attained by b an en sn the tho several Status of the Union on un as aM by b the national Constitution and atul placing the under national administration How However however ever Ier there should be such laws In III it tt lation In lion to to e nn RIf ni would prevent prent any onT difference III In the tho th of or Individual married or di divorced Il II In any RII State of ot tho the Union on removal rem 0 IRI to Another nother I State Stat The ThO fh laws law governing time the should hn equal force Coree In every overy part of ot the tho United States Stute und and bo 10 pI o every overy everywhere where Tho The decision of time the Supreme court I wIll not the th affect desired by It th thi 1 extreme opponents of ot the ue ns as a It Is l called but hUI It will hae some comae upon It anti make ake divorce to a n extent more mote difficult thrift In III the pait for tor jt will vili require rest rc deuce of lit both tho the In tin sims BUto for th Ihl full hili length of ot tune time JJ i m d tor for this the of one of thrill them Tl rile of or the right or 01 pro lire propriety of ot divorce orco except Mr one ono cause generally ns as Is 11 not touched by b time the decision of tho the Su prem preme Ourt i In the ente IMe That ThatIs I It Is sUlI an tin open question and ono one tit lint Is iii likely to b bt be Argued pro ro and a nd con no nutter how holY many now tire arc en on enacted acted It II t or how many Ju Judicial opinion lo rendered tl Kit liti that there ther should lie he uniformity con coil corning it we 11 do tIt not think will willbe be any 1111 Important Another part of ot the thu CourtN 9 the id a when i 1 ceremony Is la performed amid li Is linot I not lIot followed l by Ly cohabitation It Is not nota a n real und 1111 1 legal union U ht appears opp that when n a lawful hM elton n place even oven though the roan mAn a II as an so unwilling participant mid never nuver r lived with the 1111 Joined tn to him the time contract contrat Is III to bo ho consider COl valid and time tho wife Is entitled to sup up tort rort cud to in lbs Ih mans o tl C We do tie not assert that tutu this Is d ft new view of oC the subject but hat wedo we do lilY jay th that t It the tho matter forcibly be before before fore foie time the of or this hue country und and lint will be t e to many of them |