Show i J I S History May Not Agree I IBy S By CHESTER H. H ROWELL men When the the supreme court votes seven to to two its decision is is- law So the decision sustaining the New Y York Tork rk syn syn- act is Is isnow now the law of the land in spite of the fact that the verdict of history will probably sustain the dissenting opinions of Justices Holmes and Brandeis It is now the law that the tho more preachment of destructive theories without direct Incitement to unlawful action may be made a a. crime in spite of the constitutional guarantees of free speech The b better doctrine according to the dissenting opinions and what is more important according to the experience and of opinion of ot the free peoples of the generally is that crime consists of act or incitement to act and that philosophical philosophical phil phil- opinions however pernicious can only be crimes when they actually menace action |