Show I JITNEY BUS BS LAW LAI ISA IS A IT It IN COURTS Th The validity of Salt Lake CIt City's s new Jitney bus ordinance was at attacked attacked at- at tacked by Attorney T T. F. F Ashworth before Judge E E. A A. Rogers df dt th the tho criminal division of ot the thc cit city court to toIla today to- to Ila day The Tho attorney arguing on a a. de demurrer demurrer tie tie- submitted in the case case a against R. R D. D Young a a. Jitney bus b operator declared that the n c new ordinance was special and class legislation ITc J r agnot ag not general In application in that it singled out the of ot jitney cars and ex exempted automobiles engaged In a public service ce business Ashworth also asserted and cited au authorities authorities au- au to w sho-w that the city commission commission commis commis- sion slon hn had exceeded exceed cd its authority in the ordinance in compelling jitneys to operate on a fixed route and sch Schedule dule In declaring tho the ordinance to be unreasonable Ashworth a asserted that Jitneys w were rc compelled to pa pay a license lIcens of ot from 75 to a year ear while other public service cars paid only 40 Judge Ro Rogers t rs said that he could take no Judicial cognizance of the last Jast assertion declaring that the reasonableness reasonableness reasonableness reason reason- of ot the license of tho the Jitney would be bo fixed on the amount of at the earnings He said this could not be determined from the tho ordinance and evidence e would be needed before a de decision decision do- do on this point could b be made Tho The other arguments on tho the da- da to the complaint were taken under advisement |