Show tEMPORARY HALT HALTIN HALTIN IN IK IN ODELL CASE today sus- sus Dramel ramel ft W. W H. H Ig action the tho to KJ demurrer 1 the ed d Jt Cht by Mrs Hattie Jennings T. T Odell herd against insl George Georgo W Maud Hardy Odell Odeli and Dr 1 G G- Odell on th the ground I mas as complaint did not state stater I jt the The court action i id of r ute C Odell Odeli was within Mrs tArs td d th that t I when she collected II rights Mrs Mrs- Shep Shepherd erd for from S of her husbands husband's i af af I could not i ons and nd that such conspiracy Tho The the the basis of a I I Ie counsel was granted to file an ane n i e- days fended e ded complaint complain L l or counsel and nd a re emen me II y had Proceeded taking 7 ta m it i f. f da daYs j. j In n the tho suit brou brought ht by cl Jennings Shepherd f Ii fJ Thomas G. G Odell Oden Mrs Iut Dr Pt T TieU alS Odell and George T. T Hardy r Jar ud for alleged extor for demur demur- demur demur- damages a and TW nd n i complaint was filed flied and andr to the r r ed Vat at sessions of or the f district court Permission to ird the 1110 demurrer after general ter er i denials had been cnA en- en td A by h the defendants was granted ranted Viable counsel to clear Icar up some arisen during dunn the nta nb which had first two days of or the trial as to the sufficiency of or the allegations In the tho I complaint The jury was excused during the argument of ot tho demur demur- Counsel for the defense In support of ot the demurrer ar argued that no action action ac ac- ac- ac tion lion could bo bl maintained on an breach of ot contract because both Mrs Shepherd Shop Shep he herd rd and Dr Odell Odeli were wore married at atthe atthe atthe the time that promises of ar marriage were exchanged d. d They also argued that no action could bo be maintained on th ground of reduction and the counsel for th the plaintiff Immediately Immediate immediate- ly conceded this The only ground round I I left for tho the maintenance of or the ac ne- ac- ac tion lion according to the counsel was as wason wason ason I on the ground of af conspiracy racy to de defraud do- do fraud th plaintiff On this point counsel for far the de te der de- de r tense declared that by th the ver very al al- al legations of the tho complaint th tho plain tiff conceded that she had alienated I the lie affections of ar Dr Odell and gave ave I hId ha wife wire Mrs l s rs Maud Hardy Handy Odell an n atonable wrong nanS which was go good consideration for the 1000 Mrs rs Shepherd Is alleged to havo have paid Mrs Odell Oden to pr prevent prent ent public scandal As to the matter of or conspiracy the defendant maintained that if th there thore re is a conspiracy It must be bo followed b by a wrongful act to be bo actionable and that as the tho collection of or the b by Mrs Odell Oden was part of ot her rl rIght hl th the tho fact that Dr Odell and Georgo bongo T T. T Odoll may have conspired con con- to help her collect would not constitute facts upon which to oase an action Counsel for th plaintiff argued that the basis of af the action Is a conspiracy to to defraud the plaintiff that It was as represented to her hot that she had gained the affections I of af Dr Odell when she sho had not and that on the basis of or this deceit the de defendants do- do had conspired to secure the tho mane money from her The alienation suit brought by Mr Shepherd and dismissed at the same sImo time as the proceedIngs proceedings proceedings pro pro- has been reinstated ted In tho the district court of ar Utah Ulah Mr tr Shepherd asks damages to tho the of |