Show VI WANT ANT THE C CASE SE VIEWED REVIEWED lIE BI and Wire Wife of Bingham the District Court Jilt I in flier U e to isa Ii ii ii t ii 50 01 III it 1 its arid and e have petitioned the c court urt fot Cor it 1 writ of directed Morris Summer r justice of oC the tho thoP P CI tor or the the S nd precinct who It Ii Ia alleged In the Ill t accompAnying the petition exceeded his hili Jurisdiction antI acted without jurisdiction In the theca ca cane of vs Isaac ballo Bagg Baggan an to recover It Petitioners say Sll that they were not served with a summons although this the return mad madl 1 by constable Brig I IC Will West that personal persona service was made on IsaAC un March 1900 Judgment was against the Maggie un on April 21 11 1900 and on December Joseph attorney fur Cur an order In supplemental p u directing Hagg and amI his lIs t nIJ ur before Ju Justice Uce Sommer alit In regard to the property they ther had Through mistake inadvertence and the parties did not appear shen say they were served with II a writ ot of attachment Constable West Vest notifying them thAt the they were under arrest A ts then go on to pay ay that they are unable to rend read or under understand understand stand the English langua but bul that they were by h Welt est and en An enother Another other man named Anderson Anderaon who ac accompAnied compAnied the constable that they wore Ver under arrest t The They further claim that they were compelled to pAy their own fares fars to and from Jus JUI nay sa notwithstanding standing their objectIons to his hla non fined Mrs Bags one day in the county jail and 26 costs for non nonappearance appearance and on the hearing and ex examination at the alleged to tobe I be supplemental o tinsel her nil additional one imprisonment and for refusing to answer a ques questiOn tiOn that she was instructed by her at Frank hoffman not to answer on the ground that Sommer had no Jurisdiction scan lInac i and two days Imprisonment on similar grounds |