Show s U U iU au QUARREL OVER RAILWAY Detroi Streetcar System Involved In Iii the Sui Suite IS AX AN ISSUE nu Into tho tl in Ill time Nw New York York 0 WIl was re ic served by Justice Duhan In tle th Suo SuoI Su SuPreme I Preme Ua curt court today 11 In an aim action brought by tom L b Johnson against I It T WI Wil Wilson In son A Co bankers and br for tor al an restraining the defendants from disposing ot of the stock tint lurl ties 0 of tine the Detroit Street ays tern tem pending the trial ot of 1 a suit for tor the tho dissolution of atm Irl alele alleged OX ex between Johnson Johnon smith n It T I wn Wil soil Ion l Cu Co Mr also allo Ike asks 1 a receiver bl b for tor the railway time origin ot of the suit wa was the Put In 1191 by time the defendants of the Detroit Street Streel system after which Mr Ir Johnson with them In It its n It T 1 t Co hogan eln the th put pur chie obese tf of time concern In time the tall tail ot of 1691 11 and after atler time had In so do III lag timey In Mr lr John Johnson n 10 IS as nn an associate Itt In 1693 1593 le lie was to 1 It h Interest In thA ot of RI nil stocks or to j be rp puA j cussed U by I it T F Co II in con with lh the carrying out ot of the tho project for or time the or of all the tho surface In iii and about Detroit Mm Ir was wal ol also o to 10 charge of at clure time the Wilting of at time It at a salary ot of a year I It T 1 Wilson Co Cower were to have hae time or of the of at time the corporatIon And were to form torm such outside ar with regard to tle the url tl ties as al deemed tt lit The contract between Johnson ant and I It T Wilson Co Wil was to terminate within three YerK J it but did not e so terminate And was wal extended trl from Ina time to lImO until November beet The Il OI ot of the failure to close olae time the was the tho at 1 mi new tOt for the of at the Detroit Street Rl Rail Railway WI way Item which wits UI knOn a as time the tare fare which h was al engineered hy time of at Pack pr Pt itt a It 01 making A that they IhlY would woul carr carry passengers for tor a fire fare smith and who ho succeeded In acquiring betHI between tU tifty ald arid sixty miles ot of streets under that tram hue The scheme ot of Peek livertt semi serl nuI With uth the lall haIti down by I It r F Wilson Co ant and th they mini mAd 1 a settlement with lh le isek Bt In 19 1916 whereby h b Palk iek 1 IU agreed to deposit seventy per imer cent worth of stock In time Ih tar fare o WEre were to receIve In return In R a n nw company to II ire or an the laws ot of I 1 alk sek 1 did trot lIot deposit the full tull amount of at seventy ot of time tho In iii time the JurI company amid time ot of R a balance vaa a l basis ot of negotiations ton al as WAi was also the tho amont I It T P tinn eo Co nay MY i I for tor time the stock already These ne continued until time the mid middie tIle die ot of November last antI Ind on Novem November her ber sri an arrangement was wa made be be I IL T V WIon tilon co 0 Rn male Pack Mr Ir Johnson tuH that h hn lie ma n orally gave notice that hf he wanted antI hil his IhaN share of at time the securities url les ties an amid I that hp he would PY pay hi ot of the oula by Wilson Co In their time the amount expended being over n It t f Wilson Co deny that John Johnson Jn son give gave any Iny notice that h lie desired B a ot of time the alleged lt 1 hll prior to the making of at th the lack Pack liver li itt admit tha that II in the beginnIng ot of December hI he did ld n a written notice demanding that tIre the be Wilon Wilson 10 0 pattI 1500 tor or time the purchase ot of time the roads acquIred ly by ther but say that Johnson h has not yet It Pil pelt lii hi ot of that stun Int and cannot therefore caim ot of time the lurl ties Jollon Johnsons reply to this I Is that he alered offered to It was 18 ready to rho do 1 so at any sad and that he Is therefore entitled to 10 receive time the ot of the stock In hi his or of 15 1855 Time Th Injunction asked for lor by him for tor the restraining of at the carrying out of the Park Pack settled on hy by I It T Co a as R as debarring the transfer or of time the a helmi b by the d defendants Justice wi not render his decision until Inc he hn has reele received briefs from counsel on both side sides 01 on the thc law ot of time the case |