Show O A Non that the caN cna or of m Uth hs In Iii has ben ot or so 0 tar far its s It to his Of oC the II to which lie he was elected come orne or of our contemporaries C eaSt and west wesl are arc Indulging In speculations as n to position amonG tho States of the Union Unon A constitutional que question was waa In tin tbt action ot of the tho house of and nna that body chose choo to be governed b by popular clamor In to the provisions lon of oC the Con ConI or of the United l States This I te de some papers to imagine that Utah I can be from the Union as aB her W was excluded from Con ConJ I J grue S Thare fh aro two err pro Od OdI I lion ions although boUt both are aft or be regulated ur 11 the Supreme law of oC the I The house of I II the iou Judge ot of the of It its r and has haa the hewer Ilor if IC not rihL t I toke action In relation nn to It Ia b cite with hh I h Important of the status statu of r a sovereIgn State In the Federal Value III ft is exceedingly doubt doubtful ful CuI whether t h of oC with the executive of the nations nation hare the tho authority to put a State out ot of the Federation We do not think for n a moment how however ever that dut the P point will be tested There Is not h occasion for tor torII forit it II Utah h ie l to ta Justify any such ucb a tIn Th There re Is 18 In the pIu Act this StAle Stai that Utah hM has failed to I comply Th talk taik about her yb 10 the ct Into with lii nation lis I but n a little troth that has on an the current of lot ml misinformation that lus tho colin I 17 When It Is examined It wit t be found that It not a 11 particle of at As AI to usInG the tern term tu III by law is III of at It In U Utah Ulah than In iii any ot of the popular State ot or the Union It if the charges toot tim hAve bin made during ox clI ment true whish wo we do dD nol aol admit the polygamous marriages ni 01 tu to hove have occurred since are aN w so that thay would cut no figure fig figuro uro ure In an entered Into fot Cor Ute Uie of o obtaining facts There apprehension on the purl purt of en a as to the stability aC ot tit the Jt position ot of Utah as g one 0 of the State ot of the UIl AI Union Tits The 1st 1081 or of January II 31 contain the editorial on thU subject under the heading or of How Would You Do It Th The fan an Chronicle ro re to the tho toberi Haberle Ut which woe when whon the lie article was Thc l ort sire aro now eon con conscious that these theM exposures ot of the tha t of their polygamous betray their duplicIty and anti put Statehood In hi The election of oC a milt Inlet to 10 Congre a was InS an open violation of oC the fundamental le on which Utah lon to Statehood and It was 1 the Mormon mode molle of oak osk tug the country what It would do It The nou of l Is the answer so far as 08 Is II concerned and th there re Ianno be doubt In any anybody b body s mind what nature of at It will willbe be It If the tho Chronicle should happen hOPIn to till feel inclined to let its 1111 readers and the know how a 11 State could b ox idled from flom the Union by reason ot of mis misconduct Induct conduct of on any kinO kind from murder to larceny on art tile the part of individual citizens our San contemporary ury ary would acquire fame nil as the ot of that which has eluded the tue rt re research search of ct all the statesman and Jurists of at the tho post There Ss Is not the slightest that Utah luau will chenga Its Con Can so RS as to protect polygamy It has hall not been blen pron 1 nn any marriages have taken since the tho Mormons to abandon that odious intolerable flut Dut It In spite ot of all 1111 proba In defiance ot of decency deceno In vIola Iola tUrn lion of oC faith lilith Utah should plant polygamy In her Con Constitution site would still be a 11 member of the tam II ot of Statue and there thero would ho bo no sa except by h revolution to get herout her herout out All Ml this wn was when the tho bill for tor tue tho Blon ur of the tho Torn Terri Territory tory ot of Utah all as n a State was before Con Congress gross It was clearly understood that once In lIos ot of Statehood she ho could ro repudiate tier her and still retain Statehood There Is nothing In the nations fonda mental law to prevent any or nil all this the Stat States from Into that thal loath Sante eom relic rello of oC barbarism Statehood may be jeopardized by rebellion against the United Staten At Atan an any rote it IC a State should set el up nn an army or nav navy of Its own anti use uso such mch fore torce or against the United 1 A States It would be the or of the general nl to 10 such rebellion and for nil practical purposes Statehood would be lIu OIl eti pending the restriction r f normal conditions The rhe Itt In such n a clash Illicit and Slate would be to ln In dIate Its IC nut But polygamy detestAble a 11 It la is not bo be treated as R a te re oven oen If directly by Sate iR Practiced by In Violation of State laws It I is simply a offence ortena the tho Ju of oC the Federal courts The of l a poJ polygamIst congress is II n a matter that cannot put In jeopardy |