Show DID NOT PEACH ON UTAH t L I Ex Roberts States the i I stances Under Which lie Referred to I I Appointment of Utah i Does Docs Not Think the National Administration or Local Republicans Dd Did Wrong in iii and Position Clearly Understood When Utah Was Admitted to State Slate Statehood hood flood That the Which Cirne C Down Prom Front the Past I Should Not Be by the Political Roberts Says Ils His Silence ou ott the Appointment Queston Question Would Not lave have Prevented Official Inquiry Being eing to Show No Compact was Broken I toay today made madea 1 a statement Os al to t What hat h he raly really In Inte intended te tended dt to show dUring hi loul House In which hi h to the l ot of certain aleut alleged polygamIst to ps post mastershIps In Utah by Mc Ic le He ridicule ridiculed the Ide idea that he had poached on anyone any one ns as charged b by lb opponents and an declared d that It was aa not lila purpose to refer reter to the la mat mattee t nil seW tee ter nt at ul all In answer to questions he No sir It was no part hiatt ot of my Inn intention to arraign the national I administration fur fot appointing alleged I to Federal eora PositIons The action of the ration mUon nd and of at local Ial Republicans In IgnorIng lag Ing the charges made against those thO who h were candidates for Federal appoint meats ments Iii hI this hits State exactly right an and wa was n no violation of any arm agree meat between th State of Utah and the Unie United States The settlement ot of the question of ty ly the acton action ot of the State and the admission of the State Into the Union I Is to too wel known hee liar to ned need nn an extended explanation The debate on that Queston question Oe covers fourteen pages images of the report ot of the Ih ConstItution ConstItutional al convention and It Is Il I clear that al all that wa was Intended by the no ao lon of the convention WR was that IKI tony b be tor or the fu future tur ture that relations coming from time the past should riot nut w be dis disturbed Ind and It was nowhere In tl th Constitution which Utah was l that had nd be beci Q In tho those no s In the Pat put should be considered Ie to official The subsequent events In thc the State also alo demonstrate that It was understanding for polygamists were nominated to once In both political parties for State and national poSitions complaint and the appointment of mn men alleged to toIe be Ie In tha that relation to F Federal 11 by the admInistration Will was merel merely In s sequence with al all this that had gone before The only thing objected to in n the appointment of these thele gentlemen to I Wa Was to 0 make It appear that the election or of a 11 man main to be the He Representative I from ruin this State who ha had b ben n involved i In that system of marriage was A a vie 10 I I laton of a 11 between tire the State I of Utah and the States State I the of at these thee men b by lie tho I RepublIcan administration was IS not a aI I Violation ot of I IL My la is of ourse course that I neither by the electIon nor by the up ap was waa any Clot broken nut But If one Is II thou then I it follows that thal the tho I other othmer Is 15 ann my argument In Wah WahIngton Wash Washington Ington wa was that It the people ot of the State ot of Utah score fora to be condemned and branded as covenant breakers so soto to too must the administration and Ind Jt Its counselors and advisers In this State bear the same lurden burden My reference In the Hout House to this subject was no pet pct by childs plea tat that else WA was wasas Ie as bad t as I wars a and therefore I ough ought to o free But Dut It 1 did Involve the tho eon can of lie ver very great reat qUestions I above aboe st sot forth and the arguments hae have not yet ot b been n and canot cannot be ans answer ired Moreover I If I had been abs absolutely Ilent silent on this qu question ton I it would have havo been beon on considered as I tire the tents or of Ohio hind some time be beI before I fore the convening of Congress torme formed I and expressed the determination that that action ot of the administration should b be investigated lie He held a as did man mummy others In iii Congress that lb I was waR unjust to condemn the people of Utah for an alIgo alleged violation of the compact when the administration I hind had als also violated Iolati I it I it there had hod been such inclination and moreover had set setI et I faith them tire the example ot of acting in II bad I I Jm Through 11 hii Attorney I 11 II ot Guilty Mr by lila his Attorney James II Moyle Moyie appeared before Justice Kr Krueger or this r renter enter entered a plea ot of not gity guilty to the r charge charRe ot of unlawful cohabitation upon I which he was al arrested b by at I 7 o lok on Stura Saturday even evenIng trig Ing complainant was ot of course t Charles Owen who vho Ilp appeared In court with a Tribune artist When f lie he discovered that Mr Roberts was WIlS I there thero L by proxy he expressed I while glom gloom also overcame the sketch drawer When Mr Ir Roberts name was was caled called Mr Moyle oyle entered a 11 plea ot of not i and wah waIved prelimInary whIch the court allowed Mr Roberts bonds were fixed In the amount of at 30 I Is ills sureties werl were lenn ant and go J TaJ Tailor lul The entire arraignment proceeding consume consumed but ninety seconds I |