Show IJ W MW Ai I Th The question of r Jaw I and U t to bt be yet ct confused In which naturally bo be c ci I ewe the subject clearl It Ia ei that tile 1111 1 ot of the cItizen ma bO to III for tor tho of I thC It Is Ia 9 this moy b PUt Ic ut It If It mu hah tJ no liberty The Thebe lh bf be somewhere 7 It 11 Is II conceded that in o cOn may And ought to II he be t to secure the J 1 lauch U proper r tim l on 0 ac 1 by er th themselVes or by exposure ex to contagion are afe to earry mt t m others Thus the tho of oC th lT if dIvided be reasonably and tully fully This lit is done ono b by common cor consent It It Ia for by J ii The rule In the manner r ual their In tho lalive department of the tho the fe people comply with them Is II now flow is III altogether Would our contemporaries that tD ap i peer pear to confound the tho cst law Jaw In certain public emcee to nf sanitary regulations with nn an iMf right to compel slon to II a surg claim that the these o are 1 ll heal al or even comparative One ih r with law tho other 11 is iiii i 1 pI ply Inferred by determined jj compel compol to a a fast lut fading theory Wo We will not s sUh with Uh this Question tho i as aB to the tho vIrtues or evils ol of cowpox vaccinatIon It Is tho m l question of at the right ot of health l cers to force forro people tithe one dl Into their bodIes on the plea It t tI I 1 likely to prevent or mitigate nn another disease Is not that altogether differ r ant nt from 1 is sanitary regulation It If a citizen can bo be forced law to have hIs Infected with cow cop cowpox pox under an any pretext he and LInd the they cah can be com to swallow any drug or poisonous substance that the tho same am dais clala declare to lie be prophylactic Jc It If children can be forced to show sign Irli or of recent successful t can every efY adult person be similarly forced Lt Let down the tho bars so 0 that th liberty ot of the individual as to hll hi ti per i con IfOn and tile the bodies of his can cannot not bo be kept from the surgeons lan 1 and where here wilt will this Infringement come com cometo to a 11 atop h A could b a lawfully nod and rationally enforced thAt lio person old or young hall bo be p j wilted to enter a pUblic assembly wIth wIthout out on OIl hIs chin or at the end of at his nose signs of recent successful I vaccination as that no child lit allowed to attend school Chool without such ue evidence l It must riot not be lost sIght of l absurd of oC the health is III not to prevent n j child or adult can ln just the scene as one lIed No one ill as yet lIf line lert e l lU U exposure to Ia contagion Is affected n by vaccination u as to It upon others There Is sonic Omo lIen precaution th the spread ot of com there is II none tn in t healthy children from tM the ls l Iven It If s l Iler on Js is mutt from smallpox lie ho can carry the Infection In his his hal hair t or r his hll b beard wherever he goes oell It h Jhu heon t exposed Med to It either by visiting a or the t surroundings surrounding of at the patient Ever doctor who vho visits a h scarlet fever Cever or p tient and ho does doCs not not change nil hll hi clothes clothen and thoroughly disinfect bt i isel sel self is III n a more ori of to the public health than an person who ho has hns not thus Let t there b 10 no flO this matter The Thc N W tI the bOl bots of protestantS agaInst and tyrannical I I officIals do not raise theIr y vO against flY lawful sanitary nor to prevent the lg l subjects flut they do delp and 1100 will II maintain their own f Ji right to immunity from the lancet or scalpel when Then thc they Irs person 1 object to It and to preserve their chil from Croom the injection Into t bediM of at th the virus from a calf and arty any other lIaIson Imison tint d amer claim to have prot protective tIe ct 11 1 It l possible that any sane une ll llor or apol cannot distinguish the care nce between lawful sanitary re regu tinn and lawless to Invade th tile liberty lIbert ot of the n |