Show I TAT fORCIN i I OAl DALY COMPANY I II I J TO IN INSURE R i I I I WO KR j I I I I I Supreme Court Issues Mandate Man Man- Mandate Man Man-I date Ordering Corporation Corpora Corpora- I tion to File Bond or to lo I Show Cause February 1 I II I I T. T THE IE opinion of Dan B. B IN Shields attorney general and andi i i William M. M Knerr of the state I j I industrial commission a company i or individual employing more I Ithan j j than three persons must afford aCford protection protection pro- pro I to their and with a 0 I view to to compelling the them to do so I I the supreme court of Utah Is to be asked for an order I It Is understood that some companies companies com com- I I panics employing large largo forces have refused to obey an order to that effect ef- ef I feet from the state industrial com- com i mission One of the concerns so I I charged char is the Daly Mining company of Park City and with the object of for forcing it to file an insurance I j bond of the attorney generals general's II department through James H. H Wolfe i assistant attorn attorney y general applied applied for Cor a writ of ot mandate which was was' J granted by the tho supreme court today IThe I IThe The Daly Mining company must must I file the bond or appear before the supreme court February 1 I 1918 to state stale Its reasons for tor not so doing It Is understood that the company admits that it has ha not taken out a aI ai I i I bond to protect its workmen but that it has announced it is well able I I td pay compensation without Insuring i and filing tiling a bond with the commis- commis I SI sion I The e 1 state industrial commission is s averse to any company adopting this attitude in that it might bo be shown In a 0 claim for tor heavy damages that the concern would not be able to meet the liability As a consequence the state industrial Industrial industrial indus Indus- trial commission deems It advisable that all companies Irrespective of ii I their wealth should file insurance I bonds so that ho rho workmen will he be protected to the fullest extent No o oI I exceptions Mr Knerr contends should be allowed under any circum circum- stances Tho Daly Dab Ming company was I given until September r 19 this year to file the bond the time being extended later until December 1 16 When the company failed Called to takeout take takeout takeout out the tho bond after the period of I grace had elapsed tho the industrial comI com- com I j mission appealed to the attorn attorney y genI general general gen gen- eral with the result tho the writ was vas I issued and the whole question as to tho rl right ht of the commission to compel compel compel com com- pel pel- all employers of four or more mor persons ns to take tako out Insurance will bo be decided by the supreme court Co Companies Must Disclose Leasers So as to 0 make the workmen's workmen compensation compensation compensation com com- act applicable to all workers worker work work- er ers era where an employer has four or more the state Ind industrial commission proposes to ascertain from the different mining companies the names of the men to whom they have leased properties This action is a sequel to an accident accident accident acci acci- dent In which George Caldwell was the victim Tho The commission has discovered red ored that Caldwell was wall employed by I Continued on page pa go 4 41 STATE FORCING II ii Continued from pas page 11 Leo Bullard Bulard who is the lessee i tam tain property of the Ap Utah ring ning Company T William M. M Knerr of the In u I commission also discovered that mining company was not for any compensation that sh sho l paid to Caldwell Caldwel since the latt lattin in the employ of or Bular Bullard 5 The Tile commission is ts pi f taming a list of at the lessees of jj properties and antI to urge upon tl t ther necessity of taking taking oat 9 r protect their m mIn In the case of Caldwell Caidwell Caldwel no cibe cl ci claf be made for compensation state insurance fund since fit U did not take out insurance H II Hal J I ever is not denied the time right to toj I Cunder c cunder under the common law It I l is believed that there are arc fr cases where the lessees have b bej ep In obe obeying ing the time U taw law as its Je Jein in iii il the workmen's compensation The commission in of lessees does not wish to aci Rem arbitrarily coes but such lessees s bf as to their duty un law so that victim of accidents be able to obtain compensation the channels stipulate proper as the workmen's compensation Ion acta 1 |